Rooted in a dogma prescribed by Abraham Flexner's 100-year-old mission statement [1], research publication has been referred to as "the currency of academic advancement" [2]. As the primary accrediting organization for graduate medical education (GME) in the United States, the ACGME gives high priority to trainee research, stating the word a total of seven times in the program requirements for diagnostic radiology [3]. The ACGME mandates not only resident participation in a scholarly activity but also its subsequent publication or presentation at a scientific meeting, a requirement that many residency programs look to satisfy by having their trainees complete independent research projects. Other accessory domains of knowledge important to resident education, such as informatics, health policy, and health care economics, although perhaps more relevant than research in the day-today practice of radiology, are less explicitly emphasized by the ACGME in its written requirements for trainees. Resident Research: The Status Quo Grimm et al [4] assessed factors associated with a future career in academic radiology, concluding that medical school rankings, a medical school research year, a history of publication, and an additional advanced degree showed positive correlation with academic pursuits after radiology residency training. The researchers also found that despite the strong academic reputations of the Duke and Stanford radiology programs, only 21% of applicants to these programs from 1993 to 2010 later became academic radiologists. In 2016, the annual survey of the ACR Commission on Human Resources Workforce revealed that only 23% of radiologists work in academic or university environments [5].