2001
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v6i6.868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from open source: Intellectual property and courseware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary focus is placed on benefits that can be derived from the OSS philosophy and translation of OSS approaches to corporate management that emulate OSS style and governance practices. Chumney and Zhou (2008), Luyt (2008), Watson et al (2008b), Landsberger (2007), Currie (2005), Hepburn (2004), Wheeler (2004a), Baldi et al (2003, Keats (2003), Moore (2002), Newmarch (2001), Werry (2001).…”
Section: Open Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary focus is placed on benefits that can be derived from the OSS philosophy and translation of OSS approaches to corporate management that emulate OSS style and governance practices. Chumney and Zhou (2008), Luyt (2008), Watson et al (2008b), Landsberger (2007), Currie (2005), Hepburn (2004), Wheeler (2004a), Baldi et al (2003, Keats (2003), Moore (2002), Newmarch (2001), Werry (2001).…”
Section: Open Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, many informal open source communities have sprung up, often existing of lecturers offering 'homegrown' components and interested in furthering higher-quality education. Advantages of such open courseware are, for instance, that it is more easily corrected by global peer assessment, more material is reused, teachers are more easily able to get peer recognition and feedback, and universities can gain better teaching reputations [14]. On the other hand, there is an increasing number of commercial course aggregators.…”
Section: Courseware Development Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis is thus on free access to course materials, which would then lead to improvement of those materials through an expanded process of peer review. Newmarch (2001) likens this to research practice in universities and identifies a major contradiction: "a scientist does not advance the cause of human knowledge by suppressing their results and they do not gain peer recognition by remaining secret" ( ¶ 18). Teaching and the development of course materials, however, have not been subject to the same level of peer scrutiny and assessment.…”
Section: Opencourseware: From Globalisation To Glocalisation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching and the development of course materials, however, have not been subject to the same level of peer scrutiny and assessment. Newmarch (2001) argues that in an OCW environment, "peer assessment methods can be applied to courseware in the same way that it is applied to research" ( ¶ 20). Universities, however, tend to be nervous about 'Intellectual Property,' which is the main reason why course ware tends to be password protected.…”
Section: Opencourseware: From Globalisation To Glocalisation?mentioning
confidence: 99%