“…However, there is also a concern regarding the continuity of the program in the long term As well as the managers of the DHs, Breier et al (2013) and Motta & Maia (2015) affirm that in the semiconductor industry, investments in R&D should be continuous to ensure the success of these actions There is no consensus for managers of DHs on the availability and adequacy of financial resources for the industry by means of developing agencies Only the manager of DH-1 believes they are appropriate. For the managers of DHs 2 and 3, investments are not enough and need to be adjusted considering the resources needed to develop projects in microelectronics As observed in other countries (Wu et al, 2015(Wu et al, , 2019, authors such as Faccin et al (2016b), Lima et al (2015) and the ABISEMI (2018) reaffirm the importance of Brazilian Government actions in the semiconductor industry, as the industry depends on incentives and requires support policies designed in the long term Future of microelectronics in Brazil On the future of microelectronics in Brazil, the interviewee of DH-3 did not opine on the subject. The managers of the DHs 1 and 2 consider the industry is still at the beginning of the walk to become technologically independent, and strategies focused on the foreign market and the exploitation of new aspects should be adopted, for the development of industry Managers suggest improvements on the payment of professionals of the industry, improvement of incentive policies, investments provided by the government, and exploitation of new market opportunities, both in the industry and in the DHs In accordance with the interviewees, ABDI (2014) and the ABISEMI (2019a) believe in the amplitude of new possibilities in the semiconductor sector in Brazil, as it represents a relevant market for the electronic complex and presents business opportunities, nationally and in Latin America Source: Field study Table V.…”