2022
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.772141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned About Designing and Conducting Studies From HRI Experts

Abstract: The field of human-robot interaction (HRI) research is multidisciplinary and requires researchers to understand diverse fields including computer science, engineering, informatics, philosophy, psychology, and more disciplines. However, it is hard to be an expert in everything. To help HRI researchers develop methodological skills, especially in areas that are relatively new to them, we conducted a virtual workshop, Workshop Your Study Design (WYSD), at the 2021 International Conference on HRI. In this workshop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We plan to document the workshop via a paper that includes a meta-analysis of current practices in HRI and a discussion of the outcomes of the workshop. We hope to leverage the lessons learnt during the breakout sessions and the mini discussions to write a follow-up paper to the existing discussions on study design guidelines [3], [4]. We expect that this paper will extend prior work by providing guidelines specific to the sub-fields of HRI such as child-robot interaction, trust in HRI etc.…”
Section: P Lan For Documenting the Workhopmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We plan to document the workshop via a paper that includes a meta-analysis of current practices in HRI and a discussion of the outcomes of the workshop. We hope to leverage the lessons learnt during the breakout sessions and the mini discussions to write a follow-up paper to the existing discussions on study design guidelines [3], [4]. We expect that this paper will extend prior work by providing guidelines specific to the sub-fields of HRI such as child-robot interaction, trust in HRI etc.…”
Section: P Lan For Documenting the Workhopmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After 200 trials, participants still could not effectively imitate the nonbiological motion, and their performance did not significantly differ from their first attempt. In sum, this body of human-robot interaction research has been hampered by the vast heterogeneity of robots and paradigms (Fraune et al, 2022), with statistical reporting standards unevenly applied.…”
Section: Biological Motion In Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of one such attempt is seen in Fraune et al, [10]. Within this paper, the authors summarize the central insights gained from the recent Workshop Your Study Design (WYSD) workshop held at the 2021 International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 6 .…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%