2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01196-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned during the process of reporting individual genomic results to participants of a population-based biobank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the perspective of providing personal results to donors has been discussed since the launch of the biobank more than twenty years ago ( Sutrop & Simm, 2004 ). This has shaped public attitudes towards becoming a biobank participant: research conducted in Estonia suggests that donors see gaining personal benefits as more important ( Leitsalu, 2016 ). The campaigners may have thus calculated self-oriented appeals to be more persuasive compared to other-oriented appeals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the perspective of providing personal results to donors has been discussed since the launch of the biobank more than twenty years ago ( Sutrop & Simm, 2004 ). This has shaped public attitudes towards becoming a biobank participant: research conducted in Estonia suggests that donors see gaining personal benefits as more important ( Leitsalu, 2016 ). The campaigners may have thus calculated self-oriented appeals to be more persuasive compared to other-oriented appeals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data from the report of Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium report (Green et al, 2016 ) 32% of those with a detected secondary finding had positive family history. Recently, Leitsalu et al (Leitsalu et al, n.d. ) reported high satisfaction among biobank donors at receiving results on the genes listed in the ACMG recommendation. We do not know what proportion of the patients participated in pre‐test genetic counseling nor how well the tradition of non‐directive genetic counseling is respected in the countries included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies in some countries (such as Estonia, Latvia) have shown an increasing awareness and willingness to provide data to biobanks and decreasing concerns related to donation (Leitsalu, 2016;Mezinska et al, 2020a), in Slovakia, the awareness of biobanking has declined over 12 years. Quite a small percentage (~16%) of Slovak participants heard about biobank in 2022, but an even smaller number of them talked or searched for further information on the topic.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent within-country surveys in CEE have shown positive trends in biobank awareness. For instance, in Estonia, the number of biobanking proponents rose from 18 percent in 2001 to 70 percent in 2014, and the number of respondents who were against biobanking decreased to 1 percent (Leitsalu, 2016). In Latvia, they observed an approximately 15 percent increase in willingness to share data with biobanks as well as a slight decline in concerns related to donorship (Mezinska et al, 2020a) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%