2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned from pedestrian-driver communication and yielding patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specialists assessed pedestrian assertiveness at seven levels: extremely passive, passive, somewhat passive, neutral, somewhat assertive, assertive, and extremely assertive. Referring to Kong et al ( 9 ), seven assertiveness levels were aggregated into three levels, because some assertiveness levels in seven categories have insufficient data to mine meaningful rules from the original dataset. For example, there are only 156 records at an extremely assertive level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The specialists assessed pedestrian assertiveness at seven levels: extremely passive, passive, somewhat passive, neutral, somewhat assertive, assertive, and extremely assertive. Referring to Kong et al ( 9 ), seven assertiveness levels were aggregated into three levels, because some assertiveness levels in seven categories have insufficient data to mine meaningful rules from the original dataset. For example, there are only 156 records at an extremely assertive level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger drivers ( 21 ) and people who drive more expensive vehicles ( 22 ) were less likely to yield the crosswalk to other road users. Besides, eye contact and facial expression could help communication between drivers and pedestrians and increase pedestrian crossing assertiveness ( 9 , 23 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It will not be long, however, before drivers of autonomous vehicles (AVs) will be unable to communicate their intention, as they will be engaged in activities unrelated to driving, such as reading, typing, or watching a movie [5,6]. This situation may prove difficult for pedestrians especially, because when deciding whether to cross the street or not, they take into consideration information provided by both vehicle kinematics, such as speed and acceleration [7][8][9], and the driver of an approaching vehicle, such as gaze direction and facial expression, according to a plethora of research conducted in different cultural contexts, such as France, China, the Czech Republic, Greece, the Netherlands, and the UK [4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. To make matters worse, there is ample evidence for the underestimation of vehicle speed on the part of pedestrians, as well as the overestimation of the time at their disposal to attempt crossing the street safely [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introduction 1interaction In Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%