2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned from the application of different water footprint approaches to compare different food packaging alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research efforts may upgrade the developed model by adding the assessment of the water use impact on water stress, scarcity, and/or degradation, as a part of a broader water-based life cycle analysis [20,39]. To this end, potential environmental regulations should incorporate the local aspect of water scarcity, further taking into consideration the global nature of modern supply networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research efforts may upgrade the developed model by adding the assessment of the water use impact on water stress, scarcity, and/or degradation, as a part of a broader water-based life cycle analysis [20,39]. To this end, potential environmental regulations should incorporate the local aspect of water scarcity, further taking into consideration the global nature of modern supply networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are mainly two approaches in WF research [35]. One is the WF Network (WFN) approach, which is primarily put forward to improve water use and allocation management [36].…”
Section: Water Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have compared both methodologies [16,23], and applied them to different food products, such as tomato sauce [24], tea and margarine [25], biomass production from energy crops [26], or broccoli [27] to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%