Lessons learned in coastal habitat and land-based pollution management in the South China Sea

Vo, Si Tuan; Pernetta, John C.; Paterson, Christopher J.

doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.005

Cited by 15 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the perception of local people (Erb, 2000) also needs to be considered. Tourism destinations should find innovative ways to address the protection of different resources, such as the natural environment (Andereck, 2009;Antoci et al, 2013), especially coastal (Vo et al, 2013) and mountain areas (Bigaran et al, 2013) and cultural (Kianicka et al, 2010;Romao et al, 2013) and industrial heritage (Garaca et al, 2014), as well as to obtain tourism destination sustainability (Barbera and Butera, 1992;Carson and Carson, 2011;Carson and Taylor, 2008;Mycoo, 2014). Moreover, different institutions and governments can foster destination development through policy orientation and thus influence the sustainable evolution of nature-based destinations (Zhang and Xiao, 2014).…”

Section: Macro-levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

Gomezelj

2016

IJCHM

372

309

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the state of academic research on innovation in tourism. The authors present a systematic review of the literature, different research approaches and perspectives on tourism innovation; offer a synthesis of our findings and provide a discussion and proposals for future research. Design/methodology/approach Existing studies on innovation in hospitality and tourism (included in the Web of Knowledge database) were reviewed, and their limitations were identified. A procedure used in previous studies (Crossan and Apaydin, 2010; Tranfield et al., 2003; Becheikh et al., 2006) was applied. Moreover, aiming to reveal theoretical foundations of tourism innovation research and identify their structure, a bibliometric analysis was performed. Findings This paper identifies 152 published papers that represent the major efforts in expanding the body of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism. The importance of innovation for business and regional competitiveness and success has been recognised by both researchers and practitioners. In the papers included in the sample of this paper, the authors identified a general consensus that much remains to be done in the development of the theory of innovation in tourism. Through bibliometric analysis, nine co-citation networks, or clusters, were retrieved by applying co-citation relations among the most cited authors. The examination of these nine clusters revealed some dominant themes that characterise the field. Research limitations/implications The authors used three databases: Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and Arts & Humanities Citation Index. While these databases may not include all relevant research, the authors, nonetheless, believe that by using a rigorous procedure in reviewing the literature systematically, they were able to reduce the probability of neglecting any information that would critically change the content of the present paper. Practical implications The aim of this paper was to bring together the prior research with presently existing models that may be used in further research. For the continuation of the research, the authors propose additional studies with the aim of theory development. By introducing new theoretical ideas and theoretical models, more qualitative and inductive research would help to stimulate further work. As stated above, researchers could go further by undertaking quantitative methods to empirically verify the theoretically proposed models. Originality/value Since the last review (Hjalager, 2010) of past studies in tourism innovation, mostly focusing on studies up to 2009, tourism innovation research has grown noticeably in terms of diverse topics. In this paper’s database, the year with the most publications was 2012 with 48 papers, followed by 2014 with 42 (by 19 September), 2010 and 2011 with 41 and 2009 with 29. To the authors’ knowledge, no updated reviews focusing on innovation in tourism have been published recently. This study, consisting of a systematic review of academic literature, includes analyses of the international context, the methodology used, the points of view, the level of analysis (micro-level, macro-level and general level) and the type of innovation discussed in the paper. Moreover, the authors did not find any studies that used bibliometric analysis to identify the structure of the theoretical foundation of research in the area of innovation in tourism.

show abstract

Section: Macro-levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

Gomezelj

2016

IJCHM

372

309

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Lesson Learnedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on review [1,17,18,19], the multi-stakeholder partnership in managing resources, including natural resources, needs to consider many factors. Figure 2 below, resumed some of the factors [17,18,19]that could consider in initiating the partnership scheme. As mentioned in figure 2 below, those factors, such as value chain management [1,18], best practices concept in shrimp culture (including implemented technology and sustainable environmental aspect) [1,17,19], social and economic consideration [1,17,18,19], and public-private involvement [17,18,19], are need to acknowledge when multi-stakeholder partnership in shrimp farming activity needs to be shaped.…”

Section: Lesson Learnedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 2 below, resumed some of the factors [17,18,19]that could consider in initiating the partnership scheme. As mentioned in figure 2 below, those factors, such as value chain management [1,18], best practices concept in shrimp culture (including implemented technology and sustainable environmental aspect) [1,17,19], social and economic consideration [1,17,18,19], and public-private involvement [17,18,19], are need to acknowledge when multi-stakeholder partnership in shrimp farming activity needs to be shaped. The study reviews partnerships among stakeholders in the management of land-based and coastal habitats.…”

Section: Lesson Learnedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study reviews partnerships among stakeholders in the management of land-based and coastal habitats. This includes coordination and integration among relevant stakeholders as well as knowledge integration, the management of coastal habitat, and land-based represented the cross-sectoral board management in managing the water resource management in marine basin [17]. The partnership scheme also needs to touch on the local income and food security for the local community.…”

Section: Lesson Learnedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multi-stakeholder partnership in the context of responsible shrimp farming in Indonesia: a systematic review

Umbas

Fauzi

Purnomo

et al. 2022

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shrimp farming is an aquaculture activity with complex environmental and social issues that must be solved in cooperation with relevant stakeholders. This study aims to review the concept of multi-stakeholder partnership in the context of shrimp farming. In this study, a qualitative literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse (PRISMA) framework within the scientific literature. Based on the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4 of 17 studies published between 2010 and 2020 were selected to review further, referring to the concept of multi-stakeholder partnership in aquaculture, taking into account social-ecological system framework management. Our review revealed that multi-stakeholder partnerships allegedly become the problem solver since the complex problem can be neither understood nor addressed by only a single organization or actor involved in shrimp farming. Multi-stakeholder partnership, in which government – business – public (including farmers) are involved, will have an essential meaning in solving complex problems in shrimp farming through sharing in planning, decision making, and activities goals among them.

show abstract