2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05582-4_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned in Designing User-Configurable Modular Robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2]), the robot designer (in this case the music composer) designs the primitive behaviours and the coordination scheme. And, as is the case with userguided behaviour based robotics [5], if non-expert users (e.g. live concert audience) are supposed to manipulate and become creative with the systems, it is crucial that the designer (music composer) creates primitives on a fairly high abstraction level that allows the non-expert user to understand and have positive feedback from the human-robot interaction within a very short time frame.…”
Section: Robomusicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2]), the robot designer (in this case the music composer) designs the primitive behaviours and the coordination scheme. And, as is the case with userguided behaviour based robotics [5], if non-expert users (e.g. live concert audience) are supposed to manipulate and become creative with the systems, it is crucial that the designer (music composer) creates primitives on a fairly high abstraction level that allows the non-expert user to understand and have positive feedback from the human-robot interaction within a very short time frame.…”
Section: Robomusicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors in the definition and implementation of these modules have consequences for the remixing potential of the system. These factors include the modules' granularity, autonomy, connectivity, affordance, transparency, and interaction [5].…”
Section: Remixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the HCI literature provides surveys and design tools centered on the user. Their contribution are: (1) classification and evaluation methods [47,87,103,104], (2) benefits and challenges [2,38,84], (3) criteria for design [57,63,91], (4) how users perceive and interact with modular shape-changing UIs [51,60,74]. However, these tools mostly deal with the broader field of shape-changing UIs rather than focus on modular ones.…”
Section: Corpus Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is even more difficult for modular shape-changing UIs as modular robots provide large transformational capabilities, unlike other shape-changing UIs (e.g., [49]). Previous work encourage designers to (1) explore affordances through shape-change [118], interaction design and material design [63] and (2) to study how users perceive and interact with modular shape-changing UIs [50].…”
Section: Interactivity (Interaction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact these robots are not designed with usability purposes in mind but rather locomotion or construction. For example Lund [22] highlighted that several factors in the implementation of user-configurable robots have consequences for the user-configurability of the system. Consider for example the following scenario inspired by work on shape changing interactive devices [27][30] [39]:…”
Section: Design Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%