2013
DOI: 10.1177/0952695113479788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lester Ward and Patrick Geddes in early American and British sociology

Abstract: In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, sociology was becoming established as a discipline in the United States and Great Britain. This article looks closely at the lives and work of two prominent sociologists at this time, Patrick Geddes and Lester F. Ward. As sociology was becoming established in academic departments, neither Ward’s nor Geddes’ thought managed to survive intact. A number of factors played into this process, especially the overall broadness of their perspectives, as well as the incompatibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most accounts Geddes appears as an eccentric, marginal figure who spawned a largely ineffectual 'movement' between the wars that petered out as soon as sociology professionalised (Abrams, 1968;Bulmer, 1985;Bulmer, Bales, and Sklar, 1991;Kent, 1981). There is, of course, some element of truth in this: the 'movement' at Le Play House was institutionally weak, and Geddes was marginalised, deliberately so, by the sociological establishment at the LSE (Lybeck, 2013). But I have argued in this article that we should see regional survey less as an institutionally bound 'movement' than a methodological spirit present at the birth of the social sciences, which animated a wide range of research across the first half of the 20th century.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most accounts Geddes appears as an eccentric, marginal figure who spawned a largely ineffectual 'movement' between the wars that petered out as soon as sociology professionalised (Abrams, 1968;Bulmer, 1985;Bulmer, Bales, and Sklar, 1991;Kent, 1981). There is, of course, some element of truth in this: the 'movement' at Le Play House was institutionally weak, and Geddes was marginalised, deliberately so, by the sociological establishment at the LSE (Lybeck, 2013). But I have argued in this article that we should see regional survey less as an institutionally bound 'movement' than a methodological spirit present at the birth of the social sciences, which animated a wide range of research across the first half of the 20th century.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foundation of the first sociology department in America reflected the broader trend toward autonomy and expertise within the social sciences. Indeed, sociology was a kind of catchall term for the social sciences in general, a consequence of the Comtean ambition to be the queen of the sciences (Chriss 2006;Lybeck 2013). But, the broader ambition of sociology as the central discipline of a projected national university was quickly dispersed, nearly as soon as the department so named was established at the University of Chicago in 1895.…”
Section: German Historical Jurisprudence and The Origin Of Social Scimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a “sociable” research venture. Their connections with the Chicago ethnographers, natural science methodologies, and urban renewal programs demonstrate the international and innovative possibilities of their “amateur” approach (Lybeck ). To use the term “interdisciplinary” would be wrong, because “discipline” was not the field of practice but rather the problem at hand, which, as Mills () stated, should be the catalyst for selecting methods and data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%