Let’s not be indifferent about neutrality: Neutral ratings in the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) mask mixed affective responses.

Abstract

The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) is a picture set used by researchers to select pictures that have been prerated on valence. Researchers rely on the ratings in the IAPS to accurately reflect the degree to which the pictures elicit affective responses. Here we show that this may not always be a safe assumption. More specifically, the scale used to measure valence in the IAPS ranges from positive to negative, implying that positive and negative feelings are end-points of the same construct. This makes interpretation of midpoint, or neutral ratings, especially problematic because it is impossible to tell whether these ratings are the result of neutral, or of mixed feelings. In other words, neutral ratings may not be as neutral as researchers assume them to be. Investigating this, in this work we show that pictures that seem neutral according to the valence ratings in the IAPS indeed vary in levels of ambivalence they elicit. Furthermore, the experience of ambivalence in response to these pictures is predictive of the arousal that people report feeling when viewing these pictures. These findings are of particular importance because neutrality differs from ambivalence in its specific psychological consequences, and by relying on seemingly neutral valance ratings, researchers may unwillingly introduce these consequences into their research design, undermining their level of experimental control. (PsycINFO Database Record

The neural correlates of priming emotion and reward systems for conflict processing in alcoholics

“…Although the preferred drug and most recent use was alcohol in these individuals, our findings of group differences on frontoparietal and midbrain-limbic network engagement may not be entirely specific to alcohol addiction and could apply to other addictive substances as well. Neutral pictures were not included in the task design because neutral subjective valence ratings can result from mixed feelings and any ambivalence in response to these pictures would undermine the experimental control (Schneider et al 2016). Finally, as in all cross-sectional studies, causal inference cannot be made and our findings represent a snapshot in time of cue reactivity and primed alcohol-emotion conflict processing in sober alcoholics.…”

The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception

“…Mixed feelings can be identified only by assessing the presence and intensity of each feeling separately (e.g., "not at all" to "very much"). When this is done, even well-established "neutral" stimuli, such as the allegedly neutral pictures of the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), turn out to elicit mixed feelings (Schneider et al 2016;Schneider & Schwarz 2017). Without the ability to clearly identify mixed feelings and their respective sources, differential responses to different components of the experience may be misinterpreted as reflecting an integrative evaluation of the one component on which a given study happens to focus.…”

Children prenatally exposed to maternal anxiety devote more attentional resources to neutral pictures

“…In this case, we planned to compute correlations between the LPP amplitudes and our predictors separately for the two types of affective stimuli (i.e., neutral and unpleasant). This approach was taken because a neutral stimulus may not necessarily be perceived as “neutral” (i.e., Schneider, Veenstra, Van Harreveld, Schwarz, & Koole, ) and if ERPs to a baseline stimulus differ between two groups or are affected by a predictor, computing difference waves may hinder interpretation of the findings. A similar analytic approach was used by van den Heuvel, Donkers, Winkler, Otte, and Van den Bergh ().…”