Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND Following a diagnosis of a small unruptured intracranial aneurysm (sUIA), patients often experience psychological ailments which may be attributable to the neurovascular consultation, referral pathway, or long‐term imaging surveillance. Here, we aim to characterize the early sUIA patient journey and evaluate their psychosocial status. METHODS A mixed‐methods analysis of sUIA patients attending a large tertiary neurosciences center was performed. For patients presenting to the neurovascular service in 2020, this included: (i) a thematic analysis of patient perspectives extracted from semistructured telephone interviews, (ii) a quantitative assessment of psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and (iii) an evaluation of functional independence using a customized activity of daily living questionnaire. The relationship between service or clinical factors, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscale scores was statistically tested. RESULTS The sUIA patient cohort (n=105) had a mean age of 56.8 years (SD=15.8, female=69). Thematic analysis of interview responses (n=33) identified 5 recurrent themes underpinning the sUIA patient experience: referral, diagnosis and information sharing, imaging surveillance, psychological impairment and coping strategies, and activities of daily living, all of which contributed to patient concerns. A total of 53.6% of patients achieved a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score signifying at least mild anxiety and/or depression. Lifestyle changes most frequently affected after diagnosis included avoidance of straining‐intensive exercise, change in patterns of substance use, and work‐related performance. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant service or clinical predictors for anxiety or depression. CONCLUSION For some patients, an sUIA diagnosis appears to be associated, at least qualitatively, with a psychological burden. This is likely mediated through stressors related to the referral, diagnosis, neurosurgical consultation, and image surveillance. In the absence of evidence‐based guidelines regarding these aspects of the early patient journey, we offer suggestions aimed at improving both the neurovascular service and sUIA patient experience.
BACKGROUND Following a diagnosis of a small unruptured intracranial aneurysm (sUIA), patients often experience psychological ailments which may be attributable to the neurovascular consultation, referral pathway, or long‐term imaging surveillance. Here, we aim to characterize the early sUIA patient journey and evaluate their psychosocial status. METHODS A mixed‐methods analysis of sUIA patients attending a large tertiary neurosciences center was performed. For patients presenting to the neurovascular service in 2020, this included: (i) a thematic analysis of patient perspectives extracted from semistructured telephone interviews, (ii) a quantitative assessment of psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and (iii) an evaluation of functional independence using a customized activity of daily living questionnaire. The relationship between service or clinical factors, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscale scores was statistically tested. RESULTS The sUIA patient cohort (n=105) had a mean age of 56.8 years (SD=15.8, female=69). Thematic analysis of interview responses (n=33) identified 5 recurrent themes underpinning the sUIA patient experience: referral, diagnosis and information sharing, imaging surveillance, psychological impairment and coping strategies, and activities of daily living, all of which contributed to patient concerns. A total of 53.6% of patients achieved a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score signifying at least mild anxiety and/or depression. Lifestyle changes most frequently affected after diagnosis included avoidance of straining‐intensive exercise, change in patterns of substance use, and work‐related performance. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant service or clinical predictors for anxiety or depression. CONCLUSION For some patients, an sUIA diagnosis appears to be associated, at least qualitatively, with a psychological burden. This is likely mediated through stressors related to the referral, diagnosis, neurosurgical consultation, and image surveillance. In the absence of evidence‐based guidelines regarding these aspects of the early patient journey, we offer suggestions aimed at improving both the neurovascular service and sUIA patient experience.
BACKGROUND: Interventional neuroradiology is a relatively recent discipline that diagnoses and treats cerebral vascular diseases. However, specific literature on cognitive and psychological domains of patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures is limited. PURPOSE: Our aim was to review the existent literature on cognitive and psychological domains in patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures to raise clinicians' awareness of their mental status.DATA SOURCES: Articles were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from 2000 to 2022 using terms such as "interventional neuroradiology," "psychology," and "cognition" according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.STUDY SELECTION: Of 1483 articles in English, 64 were included and analyzed. Twelve focused on psychological aspects; 52, on cognitive ones.DATA ANALYSIS: Regarding psychological aspects, it appears that early psychological consultations and "nonpharmacologic" strategies can impact the anxiety and depression of patients undergoing endovascular procedures. Regarding cognitive aspects, it appears that endovascular treatment is safe and generates similar or even fewer cognitive deficits compared with analogous surgical procedures.DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 12 articles on psychological aspects, 6/12 were retrospective with one, while 6/12 were prospective. Among the 52 articles on cognitive aspects, 7/54 were retrospective, while 45/52 were prospective. LIMITATIONS:The main limitation derives from the inhomogeneity of the cognitive and psychological assessment tools used in the articles included in our analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Our review highlights the need to include cognitive and psychological assessments in clinical practice in case patients eligible for interventional neuroradiology procedures. In the future, much more research of and attention to cognitive and psychologic aspects of neurovascular disease is needed. Systematic incorporation of strategies and tools to access and address pre, peri-, and postprocedural psychological and cognitive components could have major benefits in patient satisfaction, recovery, and the success of endovascular practice.ABBREVIATIONS: CAS ¼ carotid artery stent placement; DAVF ¼ dural arteriovenous fistula; EC ¼ endovascular coiling; INR ¼ interventional neuroradiology; QoL ¼ quality of life; RCT ¼ randomized control trial; RIA ¼ ruptured intracranial aneurysm; SC ¼ surgical clipping; UIA ¼ unruptured intracranial aneurysm
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.