2017
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter: NICE referral criteria for lower gastrointestinal alarm features – not ideal but not poor either

Abstract: Linked ContentThis article is linked to Simpkins et al papers. To view these articles visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13996 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13846.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SIRS, We thank Min et al for their letter about our study. 1,2 We are delighted that our article has provoked debate about the utility of lower gastrointestinal (GI) alarm features in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors suggest that individual alarm features should be incorporated into a model to predict CRC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIRS, We thank Min et al for their letter about our study. 1,2 We are delighted that our article has provoked debate about the utility of lower gastrointestinal (GI) alarm features in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors suggest that individual alarm features should be incorporated into a model to predict CRC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%