2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leukemia risk in caprolactam workers exposed to benzene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We qualitatively explored the quantitative exposure–response relation between benzene and MM. Two of eight exposure assessment quality category A studies reported an increase in RR with increasing cumulative exposure (Collins et al 2003; Rinsky et al 2002); in two studies the authors reported no clear trend of RRs for MM with increasing cumulative exposure to benzene (Atkinson et al 2001; Schnatter et al 1996); and four studies did not report on the quantitative relation between cumulative exposure to benzene and MM (Bloemen et al 2004; Swaen et al 2005; Wong 1987b; Yin et al 1996). Therefore, although the evidence for an association between “any occupational benzene exposure” versus “background benzene exposure” and the RR of MM appears to be consistent, the evidence for an exposure–response relation between benzene and MM is more ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We qualitatively explored the quantitative exposure–response relation between benzene and MM. Two of eight exposure assessment quality category A studies reported an increase in RR with increasing cumulative exposure (Collins et al 2003; Rinsky et al 2002); in two studies the authors reported no clear trend of RRs for MM with increasing cumulative exposure to benzene (Atkinson et al 2001; Schnatter et al 1996); and four studies did not report on the quantitative relation between cumulative exposure to benzene and MM (Bloemen et al 2004; Swaen et al 2005; Wong 1987b; Yin et al 1996). Therefore, although the evidence for an association between “any occupational benzene exposure” versus “background benzene exposure” and the RR of MM appears to be consistent, the evidence for an exposure–response relation between benzene and MM is more ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, systematic differences in exposure assessment strategies between studies might have contributed to the between-study heterogeneity. Because all included studies assessed exposure retrospectively based on a relatively limited set of exposure measurements, exposure estimation in these studies was based partly on decision rules to extrapolate exposure measurements to time periods and exposure circumstances for which no measurements were available (Bloemen et al 2004; Costantini et al 2003; Glass et al 2003; Hayes et al 1997; Rinsky et al 2002; Rushton and Romaniuk 1997; Schnatter et al 1996; Swaen et al 2005; Wong 1987). The significant amount of expert judgment that goes into these decision rules makes it conceivable that systematic differences in exposure assessment may exist between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies selected for the meta-regression were also different with regard to the definition of the reference population that was used. The cohort studies assumed “background (environmental) exposure” in their reference populations (Bloemen et al 2004; Costantini et al 2003; Hayes et al 1997; Rinsky et al 2002; Swaen et al 2005; Wong 1987). Typical daily environmental exposure to benzene can range up to 0.2 ppm, which, over a 70-year life span, accumulates to a maximum of 14 ppm-years of cumulative exposure (Johnson et al 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regulatory agencies, epidemiological studies and peer-reviewed medical literature typically cite cumulative benzene exposures in excess of 40 ppm years as the minimum exposure required to potentially cause secondary MDS/AML [2, 47, 48]. However, exposure levels well in excess of these values may not result in a statistically significant excess incidence of AML [49, 50]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%