etrospective review of case series entails studying multiple cases in an attempt to gain a broader understanding of a particular disease process for which incidence is low, as for carotid body tumors (CBTs). Case series are feasible study designs that require less time and fewer fi nancial resources than other options. However, there can be inherent biases in case series, particularly in relation to case selection. Case reports or case series are the mainstay in the literature for CBTs, as the low prevalence rate makes other study designs, such as randomized control trials, virtually impossible. The case series method allows individual institutions to review care practices, including patient outcomes, and to standardize care for specifi c disease entities. The case study approach may also offer insight into any gaps that exist in care delivery or reasons for pursuit of one treatment instead of another. This case series was conducted to review care of patients with CBTs and their clinical outcomes following diagnosis and treatment at an academic medical center. The study may also be used to educate NP and physician assistant students as well as medical students who rotate through the vascular surgery service on diagnosis of and treatment for CBTs.The carotid body (CB) measures 2-6 mm in diameter and is located at the bifurcation of the common carotid arteries (see Medial view of right carotid artery). The CB functions as a chemoreceptor organ that plays a role in the autonomous control of BP, heart rate, and respiration. 1 It is stimulated by acidosis, hypoxia, and hypercapnia. 1 CBTs are uncommon neuroendocrine tumors that are located near the carotid bifurcation within the CB. 2 They are paragangliomas (PGLs) that originate from the embryonic neural crest. 3 PGLs