2010
DOI: 10.1080/02699930903172161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level of processing modulates benefits of writing about stressful events: Comparing generic and specific recall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Describing facet's strong negative association with sexual distress suggests that noting or mentally labeling emotions, cognitions, and sensations during sexual activities might be related to decreased sexual distress. This result is consistent with neuroscience findings demonstrating that the conscious labeling of affect modulates the brain's responses to emotional stimuli (e.g., Lieberman et al, 2007), as well as with other studies that show describing the details of an emotional experience reduces general psychological distress (e.g., Vrielynck, Philippot, & Rimé, 2010).…”
Section: Adam Heeren Day and De Suttersupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The Describing facet's strong negative association with sexual distress suggests that noting or mentally labeling emotions, cognitions, and sensations during sexual activities might be related to decreased sexual distress. This result is consistent with neuroscience findings demonstrating that the conscious labeling of affect modulates the brain's responses to emotional stimuli (e.g., Lieberman et al, 2007), as well as with other studies that show describing the details of an emotional experience reduces general psychological distress (e.g., Vrielynck, Philippot, & Rimé, 2010).…”
Section: Adam Heeren Day and De Suttersupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Results for the Nonreactivity facet are convergent with recent findings suggesting that improvement in top-down attention control, and more particularly inhibitory control, reduces psychological distress ( Heeren, Coussement, & McNally, 2016 ; Houben, Wiers, & Jansen, 2011 ; Owens, Koster, Derakshan, 2013 ; Schweizer, Grahn, Hampshire, Mobbs, & Dalgleish, 2013 ). Results for the Describing facet are consistent with recent neuroscientific findings demonstrating that verbal labeling of affect modulates brain responses to emotional stimuli ( Hariri, Bookheimer, & Mazziotta, 2000 ; Lieberman et al, 2007 ) and with evidence showing that a larger description of the details related to emotional experiences significantly reduces negative affect ( Raes, Williams, & Hermans, 2009 ; Vrielynck, Philippot, & Rimé, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this scenario, expressive writing interventions promote a beneficial meaning-making and integrative process of traumatic experience into one’s own life story, thereby constructing a narrative that connects emotion and cognition shattered by trauma and supporting health; physical benefits and emotion regulation ( Boals, 2012 ; Boals, Banks, Hathaway, & Schuettler, 2011 ; de Campora, Giromini, Larciprete, Li Volsi, & Zavattini, 2014 ; Freda, De Luca Picione, & Martino, 2015 ; Martino, Freda, & Camera, 2013 ; Schutte, Searle, Meade, & Dark, 2012 ; Vrielynck, Philippot, & Rimé, 2010 ). The narrative is a space for transformation and resignifies the traumatic experience, through which the narrator reconstructs a broken self-narrative story after a traumatic experience ( Angus & McLeod, 2004 ; Hermans, 2003 ; McAdams, 2008 ; Neimeyer, 2002 ).…”
Section: Emotional and Cognitive Processing Through Expressive Writinmentioning
confidence: 99%