2018
DOI: 10.1214/16-aihp799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level-set percolation for the Gaussian free field on a transient tree

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in section 3, we extend the result of Bricmont, Lebowitz and Maes [5] to transient simple symmetric random walks on any regular graph. This extension has been already noticed by Abächerli and Sznitman (Proposition A2 in [1]). In [9], Drewitz, Prévost and Rodriguez go further by showing that h * > 0 for a large class of graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Finally, in section 3, we extend the result of Bricmont, Lebowitz and Maes [5] to transient simple symmetric random walks on any regular graph. This extension has been already noticed by Abächerli and Sznitman (Proposition A2 in [1]). In [9], Drewitz, Prévost and Rodriguez go further by showing that h * > 0 for a large class of graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…x is the effective resistance between x and infinity for the descendants of x, see Proposition 2.2 in [1]. These graphs verify (Cap) by Lemma 3.4,3).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Extending the setting in which the identity (Isom) is valid is also interesting as this relation has already been useful in [27] and [1] to compare the critical parameter for the percolation of random interlacements and the Gaussian free field on discrete trees, and in [8] to prove strong percolation for the level sets of the discrete Gaussian free field at a positive level on a large class graphs, for instance Z d , d ≥ 3, or various fractal graphs. It is not always easy to check that the conditions (1.32) and (1.34), or (1.42), of Theorem 2.4 in [27] are exactly verified, see the proof of Corollary 5.3 in [8] which sparked our interest, and it can thus be interesting to replace them by the weaker condition (Cap), which is easier to verify.…”
Section: (B) (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations