2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels and health risks of PM2.5-bound toxic metals from firework/firecracker burning during festival periods in response to management strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] The inhalation reference concentration (RfCi) and oral reference dose (RfDo) values, along with other required parameters for HQ calculations, given below were based on previous reports. [25,27] The hazard index (HI) (Equation ( 7)) was the sum of HQ and was used to evaluate the potential risk to the human when more than one potentially toxic metal was involved. Again, if HI < 1, it was believed that the exposed population was unlikely to experience non-carcinogenic health effects, while there was the possibility that non-carcinogenic impacts might occur in the residents when HI > 1.…”
Section: Potentially Toxic Metals Attributed Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] The inhalation reference concentration (RfCi) and oral reference dose (RfDo) values, along with other required parameters for HQ calculations, given below were based on previous reports. [25,27] The hazard index (HI) (Equation ( 7)) was the sum of HQ and was used to evaluate the potential risk to the human when more than one potentially toxic metal was involved. Again, if HI < 1, it was believed that the exposed population was unlikely to experience non-carcinogenic health effects, while there was the possibility that non-carcinogenic impacts might occur in the residents when HI > 1.…”
Section: Potentially Toxic Metals Attributed Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Liu et al 2019 Reported concentrations for various elements during fireworks events in different countries for coarse (PM2.5-10 and PM10) (Moreno et al, 2007;Pongpiachan et al, 2018;Tsai et al, 2012;Vecchi et al, 2008) and fine (PM2.5) PM (Kong et al, 2015b;Liu et al, 2019;Tsai et al, 2012) (all values in ng/m 3 ). Please note that the studies represented here used various methodologies for element speciation.…”
Section: Pm Composition Associated With Firework and Bonfiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative abundance analysis (R a ) is the ratio of the percentage of the target metallic elements in PM 2.5 of the EDs over that in the NDs, as shown in Eq. (1) to identify the enriched metal influenced by the firecracker burning but not by other pollution sources (Kong et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Relative Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the sources of these chemical species were attributed to coal-burning boilers. In Category III, the highest loading was identified as NO 3 -, SO 4 2-, Ca 2+ , and K + , and followed by NH 4 + , Mg, Ti, and Al, which were characterized as road dusts (Li et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2019). The mean concentration (2.6 µg m -3 ) of PM 2.5 from the road dusts accounted for 23.0% of the total mass of PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Pmf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation