2011
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of evidence of articles published in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine journals

Abstract: The distribution of different types of article in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine journals is similar to that in other disciplines. No increase in articles with a high level of evidence was found in the selected journals over the period of study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are traditionally considered the gold standard for examining the efficacy of interventions. In the field of physiotherapy, RCTs represent a small part of the totality of research articles, but their rate is comparable to other disciplines [ 13 15 ]. The number of RCTs published in physiotherapy journals [ 14 ] and the quality of RCTs in physiotherapy field [ 16 18 ] show an increase over years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are traditionally considered the gold standard for examining the efficacy of interventions. In the field of physiotherapy, RCTs represent a small part of the totality of research articles, but their rate is comparable to other disciplines [ 13 15 ]. The number of RCTs published in physiotherapy journals [ 14 ] and the quality of RCTs in physiotherapy field [ 16 18 ] show an increase over years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of articles classified as level I evidence was about 10% of all articles evaluated. This may be higher than the level I evidence published in Brazilian medical journals (4%) 7 but it is lower than the surveys of international physical therapy journals (about 15%) 3 , 6 , 13 . The publication of level I evidence (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This is best exemplified by the recent recommendations against the widespread use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after musculoskeletal injury, particularly with muscle strains (Paoloni, Milne, Orchard, & Hamilton, 2009). It is important to note that in recent years; the volume of high quality published research has increased in Physiotherapy and Sports Medicine domains (Bleakley and MacAuley, 2002;Paci, Briganti & Lombardi, 2011;Paci, Cigna, Baccini & Rinaldi, 2009). This is not yet reflected in the literature pertaining to acute soft tissue injury management and further patient centred clinical research is essential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%