1992
DOI: 10.1038/356519a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster

Abstract: Two genomic regions with unusually low recombination rates in Drosophila melanogaster have normal levels of divergence but greatly reduced nucleotide diversity, apparently resulting from the fixation of advantageous mutations and the associated hitch-hiking effect. Here we show that for 20 gene regions from across the genome, the amount of nucleotide diversity in natural populations of D. melanogaster is positively correlated with the regional rate of recombination. This cannot be explained by variation in mut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

72
713
5
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 928 publications
(792 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
72
713
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is so, it may not be possible to move far enough away from potential targets of selection to completely eliminate any bias (as discussed above). Moreover, it is essential to omit regions with lowered recombination rates, where the impact of linked selection will be strongest (Begun and Aquadro 1992). As a corollary to this, demographic estimation performed from regions of the genome at differing genetic distances from regions experiencing selection should recover different parameter estimates (Gazave et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is so, it may not be possible to move far enough away from potential targets of selection to completely eliminate any bias (as discussed above). Moreover, it is essential to omit regions with lowered recombination rates, where the impact of linked selection will be strongest (Begun and Aquadro 1992). As a corollary to this, demographic estimation performed from regions of the genome at differing genetic distances from regions experiencing selection should recover different parameter estimates (Gazave et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship was initially attributed to Hill-Robertson effects of increased efficacy of selection in areas of increased recombination (Comeron et al 1999;Hey and Kliman 2002;Kliman and Hey 1993). Because in areas of reduced recombination, fixation probabilities of novel mutations will be affected by the fixation probabilities of mutations at linked sites, the ability of natural selection to discriminate among variants will be compromised with increased linkage among sites (Aquadro 1997;Begun and Aquadro 1992;Hill and Robertson 1966).…”
Section: Codon Usage and Recombination Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship was initially attributed to Hill-Robertson effects; if codon bias in Drosophila were under selection for translational efficiency, then the efficacy of this selection should increase with increased recombination, leading to increased codon bias in regions of high recombination. This is because regions of reduced recombination are generally subject to weaker purifying selection and less effective positive selection due to linkage among sites (Aquadro 1997;Begun and Aquadro 1992;Hill and Robertson 1966). However, given that 21 of 22 optimal codons in Drosophila end in G or C, the positive correlation between codon bias and recombination rate in Drosophila can also be attributed to a recombination-associated bias in patterns of neutral point substitution towards increased GC (Marais et al , 2003Singh et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results have been confirmed and extended by Kaplan et al (1988), and Wiehe & Stephan (1993). Reduced heterozygosity in regions of low recombination in Drosophila, found by Begun & Aquadro (1991) and others, has been attributed to the effects of hitch-hiking, although Charlesworth et al (1993) have proposed an alternative explanation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%