2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of non-polybrominated diphenyl ether brominated flame retardants in residential house dust samples and fire station dust samples in California

Abstract: Eleven novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) were analyzed in dust samples from California homes as a part of the Northern California Childhood Leukemia Study (NCCLS) and from the living quarters of California fire stations as a part of the Firefighter Occupational Exposure (FOX) study using high resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The eleven NBFRs, were: α- and β-1,2-dibromo-4-(1,2-dibromoethyl)cyclohexane (α- and β-DBE-DBCH), 2-bromoallyl 2,3,6-tribromophenylether (BATE), pentabromotoluene (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels of EH-TBB and BEH-TEBP (median (range) = <MDL (<MDL-310.9) and 56.4 (<MDL-7,811) ng/g, respectively) were much lower than the PFR compounds. The maximum TCEP and TDCIPP dust levels were among the highest ever reported although, in general, the median levels were lower in CHAMACOS compared to other U.S. cohorts (median (range) = 1,079 (112.1–157,000) ng/g and 1,506 (181.3–2,140,000) ng/g, respectively) (Bradman et al 2014; Brown et al 2014; Dodson et al 2012; Hoffman et al 2015b; Meeker and Stapleton 2010; Schreder and La Guardia 2014; Stapleton et al 2014). In comparison to international studies, CHAMACOS TCEP and TDCIPP medians were slightly lower than reported levels in Japan and Sweden (Bergh et al 2011; Kanazawa et al 2010) and were similar to or higher than levels reported in studies from Belgium, New Zealand, Pakistan and Spain (Ali et al 2012a; Ali et al 2012b; Brommer et al 2012; Garcia et al 2007; Van den Eede et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Levels of EH-TBB and BEH-TEBP (median (range) = <MDL (<MDL-310.9) and 56.4 (<MDL-7,811) ng/g, respectively) were much lower than the PFR compounds. The maximum TCEP and TDCIPP dust levels were among the highest ever reported although, in general, the median levels were lower in CHAMACOS compared to other U.S. cohorts (median (range) = 1,079 (112.1–157,000) ng/g and 1,506 (181.3–2,140,000) ng/g, respectively) (Bradman et al 2014; Brown et al 2014; Dodson et al 2012; Hoffman et al 2015b; Meeker and Stapleton 2010; Schreder and La Guardia 2014; Stapleton et al 2014). In comparison to international studies, CHAMACOS TCEP and TDCIPP medians were slightly lower than reported levels in Japan and Sweden (Bergh et al 2011; Kanazawa et al 2010) and were similar to or higher than levels reported in studies from Belgium, New Zealand, Pakistan and Spain (Ali et al 2012a; Ali et al 2012b; Brommer et al 2012; Garcia et al 2007; Van den Eede et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to international studies, CHAMACOS TCEP and TDCIPP medians were slightly lower than reported levels in Japan and Sweden (Bergh et al 2011; Kanazawa et al 2010) and were similar to or higher than levels reported in studies from Belgium, New Zealand, Pakistan and Spain (Ali et al 2012a; Ali et al 2012b; Brommer et al 2012; Garcia et al 2007; Van den Eede et al 2011). Figure 1 presents median flame retardant levels in CHAMACOS dust compared to other published U.S. studies (Bradman et al 2014; Brown et al 2014; Dodson et al 2012; Hoffman et al 2015b; Meeker and Stapleton 2010; Schreder and La Guardia 2014; Stapleton et al 2014). CHAMACOS sampling occurred in 2000–2001, before the PBDE phase out, while sampling in the other studies was more recent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al measured non-PBDE brominated flame retardants in the same cohort of fire stations, 28 whereas in this complementary pilot study, we assessed the concentration of PBDEs, PAHs, and PCBs in the fire station dust and tried to identify the determinants of the observed concentrations.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust samples from the fire stations showed higher concentrations compared to those from houses, with EH-TBB being the most dominant compound in both sampling areas. NBFRs released during fire events might have transferred to the living quarters of fire stations through the firefighters (Brown et al, 2014). Lower levels of EH-TBB and BEH-TEBP and higher levels of BTBPE and DBDPE were found in house dust collected from Washington compared to house dust from California, with EH-TBB also found to be the most dominant NBFR (Schreder and La Guardia, 2014).…”
Section: Dp and Nbfrs In The Indoor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the United States, levels of NBFRs were measured in the indoor dust from houses and fire stations (Brown et al, 2014;Schreder and La Guardia, 2014). Dust samples from California homes and in living quarters from California fire stations were investigated for EH-TBB, BTBPE, DBDPE, and BEH-TEBP contamination.…”
Section: Dp and Nbfrs In The Indoor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%