2011
DOI: 10.1021/jf104943p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of Perfluorinated Compounds in Food and Dietary Intake of PFOS and PFOA in The Netherlands

Abstract: This study presents concentrations of perfluorinated compounds in food and the dietary intake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in The Netherlands. The concentrations of perfluorinated compounds in food were analyzed in pooled samples of foodstuffs randomly purchased in several Dutch retail store chains with nation-wide coverage. The concentrations analyzed for PFOS and PFOA were used to assess the exposure to these compounds in The Netherlands. As concentrations in drinking wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

11
133
1
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
133
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest exposure (99 th percentile) for PFOS and PFOA was 0.6 and 0.5 ng/kg b.w. per day, respectively (VWA, 2010;Noorlander et al, 2011). The close to 10-fold lower exposure reported in the Dutch population compared to other studies can be partly explained by the more sensitive analytical methods applied in the analysis of PFASs in food (LODs and LOQs in the low range of pg/kg) thus reducing the influence of the left-censored data on the exposure estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest exposure (99 th percentile) for PFOS and PFOA was 0.6 and 0.5 ng/kg b.w. per day, respectively (VWA, 2010;Noorlander et al, 2011). The close to 10-fold lower exposure reported in the Dutch population compared to other studies can be partly explained by the more sensitive analytical methods applied in the analysis of PFASs in food (LODs and LOQs in the low range of pg/kg) thus reducing the influence of the left-censored data on the exposure estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a study on the dietary exposure of the Dutch population to PFOS and PFOA, (Noorlander et al,2011) it was reported that drinking water was the main contributor to PFOS and PFOA. However, no information on the actual concentration of PFOS and PFOA in the Dutch drinking water was available so the indicative concentrations used in the EFSA Scientific Opinion (EFSA, 2008) were applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the literature on PFAAs in food and/or dietary intake has increased rapidly but data necessary to estimate the intake via food remain scarce (Ericson et al, 2008;Ericson-Jogsten et al, 2009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.011 0045-6535/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Noorlander et al, 2011;Cornelis et al, 2012;Vestergren et al, 2012b;Klenow et al, 2013). However, PFAAs in food items in which high levels are expected such as fish, seafood, organs (liver) and meat products are described in the literature (D'Hollander et al, 2010;EFSA, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, data in water and/or drinking water are relatively abundant (D'Hollander et al, 2010;Eschauzier et al, 2011). On the other hand, sufficient data on other food items such as cereals, fruits, vegetables, fats, sugar-rich products and processed food are occasionally described even though they are consumed in high amounts (Ericson et al, 2008;Noorlander et al, 2011;Vestergren et al, 2012b). This could be explained by the lack of reliable sensitive analytical methods which are required to detect PFAAs at the pg g À1 levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if plants grow in PFAA-contaminated soil and are fed to livestock, PFAA will enter the food chain by way of food of animal origin and might expose consumers. Some studies have reported the presence of PFAA in food of animal origin (Wang et al 2008;Guruge et al 2008;Noorlander et al 2011); however, the investigators could not identify the exposure pathway. Systematic studies on the transfer of PFOA and PFOS from contaminated feed into food of animal origin are currently not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%