2017
DOI: 10.4103/2394-2010.199330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of some electrolytes and glucose in Saudi water pipe smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge this is the largest study exploring the adverse effect of hookah smoking. In line with a recent study in Saudi Arabia FBG was not significantly associated with hookah smoking [ 10 ] while cigarette smokers had significantly lower levels of glucose in compare with non-smokers. The few studies on the effect of hookah smoking on lipid profile are inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge this is the largest study exploring the adverse effect of hookah smoking. In line with a recent study in Saudi Arabia FBG was not significantly associated with hookah smoking [ 10 ] while cigarette smokers had significantly lower levels of glucose in compare with non-smokers. The few studies on the effect of hookah smoking on lipid profile are inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Only an experimental study and a single study with a relatively small sample size have been conducted about hookah smoking and hematological measurements [ 8 , 9 ]. The only study on the effect of hookah smoking and serum glucose level in a small sample population was recently published [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 ] These diseases are caused by the effects of smoking tobacco on many different cells, organs, processes, and different systems of the body that lead to changes in the counts of cells and concentrations of different substances or hormones secreted by cells or tissues in the body that affect mainly the respiratory, cardiovascular, immunological, hematological, and reproductive systems. [ 3 4 5 6 7 ] Many studies have been carried out on the effects of cigarette smoking, and to a much lesser extent, on WPS on general health, immunity, and their link to inflammatory diseases and other related diseases, although the findings are contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An association between narghile use and malignancies, such as lung, oral, and nasopharyngeal cancer, has been suggested (Ben Saad, 2010; Bou Fakhreddine et al, 2014; El-Zaatari et al, 2015; Khemiss, Rouatbi, Berrezouga, & Ben Saad, 2016; Waziry et al, 2017). Studies about the effects of narghile use on biochemical data and metabolic profile are scarce (Al Mutairi, Shihab-Eldeen, Mojiminiyi, & Anwar, 2006; Hallit et al, 2017; Koubaa et al, 2015; Mahassni & Alajlany, 2017; Saffar Soflaei et al, 2018; Shafique et al, 2012). Even in the WHO second edition related to narghile use, no information about its possible effects on smokers’ biochemical or metabolic profile was reported (WHO, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the inclusion of elderly subjects more than 60 years of age (Al Mutairi et al, 2006; Saffar Soflaei et al, 2018; Shafique et al, 2012) may introduce a bias because the prevalence of altered metabolic data (e.g., MetS) increases with age (Ribeiro, Seixas, Galvez, & Climent, 2018). Third, the lack of information about the different types of the narghile tobacco used (Hallit et al, 2017; Koubaa et al, 2015; Mahassni & Alajlany, 2017; Saffar Soflaei et al, 2018; Shafique et al, 2012), makes any comparison difficult, because in the case of tombak or jurak , in comparison to tabamel , the pattern is different (Ben Saad, 2009). Fourth, different methods of narghile-use quantification (not reported [Hallit et al, 2017; Mahassni & Alajlany, 2017; Saffar Soflaei et al, 2018; Shafique et al, 2012], run/day [Al Mutairi et al, 2006], total duration of smoking [Al Mutairi et al, 2006], narghile/year [NY; Koubaa et al, 2015], and quantity in kg of tobacco smoked/year [Koubaa et al, 2015]) were applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%