Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence 2021
DOI: 10.5220/0010331411311136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Automated Machine Learning for Text Classification: Evaluation of AutoML Tools and Comparison with Human Performance

Abstract: Recently, Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has registered increasing success with respect to tabular data. However, the question arises whether AutoML can also be applied effectively to text classification tasks. This work compares four AutoML tools on 13 different popular datasets, including Kaggle competitions, and opposes human performance. The results show that the AutoML tools perform better than the machine learning community in 4 out of 13 tasks and that two stand out. RELATED WORKAutoML services opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is the main reason that AutoML [25], [26] is a convenient alternative to achieve outstanding performance while saving time and effort of searching for the appropriate parameters. An interesting analysis is given by [27] comparing four AutoML tools with human performance over 13 commonly used datasets, and the obtained results were impressive as they show that AutoML tools outperform the machine learning process achieved by human data scientists in 4 of 13 tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the main reason that AutoML [25], [26] is a convenient alternative to achieve outstanding performance while saving time and effort of searching for the appropriate parameters. An interesting analysis is given by [27] comparing four AutoML tools with human performance over 13 commonly used datasets, and the obtained results were impressive as they show that AutoML tools outperform the machine learning process achieved by human data scientists in 4 of 13 tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are works published that compare the performance of various existing AutoML tools on text classification tasks. Blohm et al [8] attempt to answer the question of whether AutoML can be effectively applied to text classification or not. They compare the performance of four AutoML tools on thirteen text classification datasets and document how they perform as opposed to human-engineered models.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, benchmarks have been done that compare several AutoML approaches and their performance on different problems, also including NLP tasks [1]. For instance, in one of our previous works we have performed an opensource AutoML benchmark for text classification [10]. The focus was on comparing the classification results of four different AutoML tools both among each other and with the results of machine learning experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%