2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Classification Metrics for Quantitative System-Level Analysis with Temporal Logic Specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the models were trained for 300 epochs and using an Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU. In object detection, precision and recall are essential metrics used to evaluate the performance of a trained model in correctly identifying detected objects [21]. Precision (4) measures the proportion of positive vehicle identifications that were accurately identified using true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) detections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the models were trained for 300 epochs and using an Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU. In object detection, precision and recall are essential metrics used to evaluate the performance of a trained model in correctly identifying detected objects [21]. Precision (4) measures the proportion of positive vehicle identifications that were accurately identified using true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) detections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision (4) measures the proportion of positive vehicle identifications that were accurately identified using true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) detections. On the other hand, recall (5) measures the proportion of actual positive identifications that were correctly identified using true positive (TP) and false negative (FN) detections [21]. A high value of precision and recall indicates that the model can accurately detect all positive vehicles correctly and classify them accurately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluating object detection methods, many essential ways are used to analyze model performance [17], such as recall accuracy precision IoU and f1 score.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon the results of [25], the key contributions of this paper are (i) framing the problem of synthesizing test environments for reach-avoid specifications in linear temporal logic (LTL) as a multi-commodity network flow problem, (ii) presenting an efficiently solvable convex-concave min-max optimization-based relaxation that results in a constrained test, (iii) demonstrating the approach by executing the resulting test strategy to reactively test dynamic locomotion behaviors of the Unitree A1 quadruped. A key advantage of our method is that the synthesized test is reactive -the constraints visible to the system under test are reactive to the system state and depend on the system's strategy, which is not known to the tester a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%