2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijbir.2016.074830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging communities of practice in university-industry collaboration: a case study on Arctic research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topic of university-industry cooperation is very prolific in the literature [6][7][8][9], and there are many different mechanisms (and formal or informal channels) for universities to liaise with enterprises that do not necessarily involve knowledge transfer [10][11][12][13]. This article focuses on understanding an uncoded tacit knowledge transfer channel, which allows continuous collaborative work: open innovation communities (OICs), understood as spaces that facilitate the exchange and use of tacit knowledge, collective learning, problem solving, and opportunities to innovate [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of university-industry cooperation is very prolific in the literature [6][7][8][9], and there are many different mechanisms (and formal or informal channels) for universities to liaise with enterprises that do not necessarily involve knowledge transfer [10][11][12][13]. This article focuses on understanding an uncoded tacit knowledge transfer channel, which allows continuous collaborative work: open innovation communities (OICs), understood as spaces that facilitate the exchange and use of tacit knowledge, collective learning, problem solving, and opportunities to innovate [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of this study imposes some limitations. As mentioned, the supplier-customer relationship is unique, and the context of the study was specific in representing long-term triadic public-private collaboration, where the head of the co-innovation project was a university because of the research-and-innovation orientation of the projects (for importance of these types of relationships see also Iskanius and Pohjola, 2016). However, the key issue in the findings is the trusting personal-level relationships of long duration, and not the specific context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology's role in mediating real-world relevance (Bhatnagar & Badke-Schaub, 2017) is critical, as it can proactively induct novices into professional practice (P. Brown, 2015;Herrington, Reeves, & Oliver, 2014). This perspective should be noted especially nowadays, when industry-university alliances are increasingly endorsed by academic institutions (Iskanius & Pohjola, 2016;Mulgan, Townsley, & Price, 2016). That said, only a few VCoP studies have chosen to consider cross-organizational setups.…”
Section: Communities Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study employed an authentic CoP model (Iskanius & Pohjola, 2016), with members from the industry willingly joining the community as mentors and expert evaluators for the students. These members tend to be ethically motivated to share their expertise and contribute positively to higher education.…”
Section: The Copmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation