2018
DOI: 10.1101/297176
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging DNA methylation quantitative trait loci to characterize the relationship between methylomic variation, gene expression and complex traits

Abstract: Characterizing the complex relationship between genetic, epigenetic and transcriptomic variation has the potential to increase understanding about the mechanisms underpinning health and disease phenotypes. In this study, we describe the most comprehensive analysis of common genetic variation on DNA methylation (DNAm) to date, using the Illumina EPIC array to profile samples from the UK Household Longitudinal study. We identified 12,689,548 significant DNA methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL) associations… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SNPs and 43,337 DNA methylation sites. The whole blood mQTL dataset was generated using DNAm and SNP data from 2,082 individuals 78 and included 30,432,023 cis mQTLs between 4,030,902 SNPs and 167,854 DNA methylation sites. mQTLs reaching the significance threshold P ≤ × 10 -10 were taken forward for SMR analysis as described by Hannon and colleagues 78 .…”
Section: Summary-based Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SNPs and 43,337 DNA methylation sites. The whole blood mQTL dataset was generated using DNAm and SNP data from 2,082 individuals 78 and included 30,432,023 cis mQTLs between 4,030,902 SNPs and 167,854 DNA methylation sites. mQTLs reaching the significance threshold P ≤ × 10 -10 were taken forward for SMR analysis as described by Hannon and colleagues 78 .…”
Section: Summary-based Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prefrontal cortex mQTL dataset was generated using DNA methylation and SNP data from 522 individuals from the Brains for Dementia Research cohort and included 4,623,966 cis mQTLs (distance between QTL SNP and DNAm site ≤ 500 kb) between 1,744,102 SNPs and 43,337 DNA methylation sites. The whole blood mQTL dataset was generated using DNAm and SNP data from 2,082 individuals 78 and included 30,432,023 cis mQTLs between 4,030,902 SNPs and 167,854 DNA methylation sites. mQTLs reaching the significance threshold P ≤ × 10 -10 were taken forward for SMR analysis as described by Hannon and colleagues 78 .…”
Section: Summary-based Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prefrontal cortex mQTL dataset was generated using DNA methylation and SNP data from 522 individuals from the Brains for Dementia Research cohort 22 and included 4,623,966 cis mQTLs (distance between QTL SNP and DNAm site ≤ 500 kb) between 1,744,102 SNPs and 43,337 DNA methylation sites. The whole blood mQTL dataset was generated using DNAm and SNP data from 2,082 individuals 78 and included 30,432,023 cis mQTLs between 4,030,902 SNPs and 167,854 DNA methylation sites. mQTLs reaching the significance threshold P ≤ 1 × 10 -10 were taken forward for SMR analysis as described by Hannon and colleagues 78 .…”
Section: Summary-based Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we harmonized the retrieved data by converting them to SMR 20 or GSMR 21 format for downstream analyses. We obtained GWAS summary statistics for SNPs that influence the human blood proteome (pQTLs) from Sun et al 22 GWAS summary statistics for SNPs that influence transcriptome (eQTLs) were from Võsa et al 23 and GWAS summary statistics for SNPs that influence DNA methylation (mQTLs) were derived from two studies 19,24 . These studies are independent with reference to study participants and were conducted using blood samples.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%