2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging e-Infrastructures for Urgent Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system aims to provide resources quickly and efficiently to high-priority applications that must be executed without delay. However, a more recent study [6] shows that enabling shared infrastructures for UC remains challenging. One important challenge is that no existing job scheduling policies are suitable for shared infrastructures supporting UC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The system aims to provide resources quickly and efficiently to high-priority applications that must be executed without delay. However, a more recent study [6] shows that enabling shared infrastructures for UC remains challenging. One important challenge is that no existing job scheduling policies are suitable for shared infrastructures supporting UC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the damage to the dedicated resources can make it impossible to perform urgent computations that can help to mitigate the damages [5]. Due to these limitations, using existing shared infrastructures becomes an invaluable approach to supporting UC [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Existing approaches tend to focus on optimization of individual tasks or computational steps (e.g. resource allocation [9], data stream processing [10], or provisioning of storage resources [11]) rather than on optimizing the process as a whole. In particular, the correlation with data delivery has not been fully supported in target processing subsystems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%