2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3175-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging genetically simple traits to identify small-effect variants for complex phenotypes

Abstract: BackgroundPolymorphisms underlying complex traits often explain a small part (less than 1 %) of the phenotypic variance (σ2 P). This makes identification of mutations underling complex traits difficult and usually only a subset of large-effect loci are identified. One approach to identify more loci is to increase sample size of experiments but here we propose an alternative. The aim of this paper is to use secondary phenotypes for genetically simple traits during the QTL discovery phase for complex traits. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis also highlights the importance of intermediate trait QTL, including QTLs for metabolic traits and gene expression (mQTLs, geQTLs, eeQTLs, sQTLs and aseQTLs). This is not a surprising result as the significant contribution of different intermediate trait QTLs to complex trait variations have been reported in humans (7,26,(39)(40)(41) and cattle (13,(42)(43)(44). To our knowledge, no study has systematically compared the genetic importance of mQTLs with eQTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our analysis also highlights the importance of intermediate trait QTL, including QTLs for metabolic traits and gene expression (mQTLs, geQTLs, eeQTLs, sQTLs and aseQTLs). This is not a surprising result as the significant contribution of different intermediate trait QTLs to complex trait variations have been reported in humans (7,26,(39)(40)(41) and cattle (13,(42)(43)(44). To our knowledge, no study has systematically compared the genetic importance of mQTLs with eQTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several genes with substantial impacts on milk yield are known, including DGAT1 [5], ABCG2 [6], GHR [7], SLC37A1 [8], and MGST1 [9]. Recently, as part of work presented elsewhere [10], we performed a milk volume genome-wide association analysis in 4,982 mixed breed cattle using a BayesB model [11,12], using a panel of 3,695 variants selected as tag-SNPs representing expression QTL (eQTL) from lactating mammary tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example follows. Kemper et al [25] found that a QTL that explained 0.001 of the genetic variance for milk yield co-segregated with a QTL that explained 0.1 of the genetic variance for phosphorus concentration in milk. The SNPs with a large effect on both traits mapped near a gene for a phosphorus anti-porter that transports glucose-6-phosphate in one direction and phosphorus in the other direction across cell membranes.…”
Section: Mapping and Identification Of Causal Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%