2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01106-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging genomic diversity for discovery in an electronic health record linked biobank: the UCLA ATLAS Community Health Initiative

Abstract: Background Large medical centers in urban areas, like Los Angeles, care for a diverse patient population and offer the potential to study the interplay between genetic ancestry and social determinants of health. Here, we explore the implications of genetic ancestry within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ATLAS Community Health Initiative—an ancestrally diverse biobank of genomic data linked with de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) of UCLA Health patients (N=36,736). … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ancestry ascertainment in ATLAS. The ATLAS individuals are clustered into five genetic ancestry clusters -European Americans (EA), Hispanic and Latino Americans (HL), South Asian Americans (SAA) and East Asian Americans (ESA) and African Americans (AA) as described in ref 25 based on their proximity with 1000 Genome super populations on the PC space. First, we filter the ATLAS typed genotypes with plink2 by Mendel error rate ('plink --me 1 1 -set-me-missing'), founders ('--filterfounders'), minor allele frequency ('-maf 0.15'), genotype missing call rate ('--geno 0.05'), and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test p-value ('-hwe 0.001').…”
Section: Analytical Form Of Individual Pgs Accuracy Under Infinitesim...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ancestry ascertainment in ATLAS. The ATLAS individuals are clustered into five genetic ancestry clusters -European Americans (EA), Hispanic and Latino Americans (HL), South Asian Americans (SAA) and East Asian Americans (ESA) and African Americans (AA) as described in ref 25 based on their proximity with 1000 Genome super populations on the PC space. First, we filter the ATLAS typed genotypes with plink2 by Mendel error rate ('plink --me 1 1 -set-me-missing'), founders ('--filterfounders'), minor allele frequency ('-maf 0.15'), genotype missing call rate ('--geno 0.05'), and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test p-value ('-hwe 0.001').…”
Section: Analytical Form Of Individual Pgs Accuracy Under Infinitesim...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different algorithms and/or reference panels may assign the same individual to different clusters 15,23,24 and thus to different PGS accuracy classes. Moreover, many individuals are not assigned to a cluster due to limited reference panels used for genetic ancestry inference 23,25 , leaving such individuals outside PGS accuracy characterization; this poses equity concerns as it limits PGS applications only to individuals within well-defined clusters of genetic ancestries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used a publicly available PGS for tobacco use disorder, developed in European-ancestry individuals in UK Biobank 14, and imputed these scores into the UCLA ATLAS biobank [15][16][17][18][19] . We found that the TUD-PGS demonstrated inconsistent predictive performance and risk stratification in non-European ancestry groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, we combined a PGS for tobacco use disorder (TUD) with a PheWAS approach to create a PGS-PheWAS, a powerful way to examine the potential pleiotropic effects of multiple genetic variants that predispose to tobacco use disorder and identify systemic disease risks for individuals with a genetic predisposition to tobacco use 13 . We used a publicly available PGS for tobacco use disorder, developed in European-ancestry individuals in UK Biobank 14 , and imputed these scores into the UCLA ATLAS biobank which comprises consented and genotyped UCLA patients representing diverse ancestry groups and phenotypes drawn from their electronic health records [15][16][17][18][19] . We found that the TUD-PGS demonstrated inconsistent predictive performance and risk strati cation in non-European ancestry groups within the UCLA ATLAS biobank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%