2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-020-01437-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging historical aerial photographs and digital photogrammetry techniques for landslide investigation—a practical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the Change Detection between the 1982 photographs and the laser scanning in 2019 are shown in Figure 3 [30]. Negative values correspond to material loss and positive values correspond to movement towards the scanner (out of slope).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the Change Detection between the 1982 photographs and the laser scanning in 2019 are shown in Figure 3 [30]. Negative values correspond to material loss and positive values correspond to movement towards the scanner (out of slope).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes calculated within ± two standard deviations were considered potential measurement randomness. The limit of detection between the 1982 photogrammetric model and the 2019 LiDAR model was 1 m, attributed to a lower accuracy of the 1982 model derived from historic photos and surficial changes between 1982 and 2019 due to erosional processes [30].…”
Section: Instrumentation and Remote Sensing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations