2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Human-Centered Design in Chronic Disease Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, many health apps have not been designed with input from healthcare or behavioral change professionals, have limited functionality, and may not have up‐to‐date information . It is also not uncommon for technology‐focused healthcare interventions to be designed without any input from the targeted users . Recently, federal funding agencies, such as the NIH and Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute, have begun to recognize that the lack or only token level involvement of patients or caregivers has failed to result in interventions that are highly relevant to actual end users .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, many health apps have not been designed with input from healthcare or behavioral change professionals, have limited functionality, and may not have up‐to‐date information . It is also not uncommon for technology‐focused healthcare interventions to be designed without any input from the targeted users . Recently, federal funding agencies, such as the NIH and Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute, have begun to recognize that the lack or only token level involvement of patients or caregivers has failed to result in interventions that are highly relevant to actual end users .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 It is also not uncommon for technology-focused healthcare interventions to be designed without any input from the targeted users. [24][25][26] Recently, federal funding agencies, such as the NIH and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, have begun to recognize that the lack or only token level involvement of patients or caregivers has failed to result in interventions that are highly relevant to actual end users. 27,28 The inclusion of the intended user and a multidisciplinary team in the development process increases the functionality and usability of the technology by keeping the focus on user's needs and increasing the likelihood it will be successfully used in the real-world setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of HCD are becoming more widely used in the health care industry, and HCD is the standard process used at the CFI. [15][16][17][18] This method consists of 4 phases: (1) qualitative research to understand user needs, (2) synthesizing research into design concepts that are rapidly prototyped and iteratively tested in situ to validate the designs, (3) robustly prototyping designs and testing them in research studies, and (4) scaling and implementing across our organization. Solutions and opportunities identified using HCD methods must carefully account for any contextual factors, such as cultural, technical, and financial constraints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research approach is novel because, guided by Design Thinking [6], it successfully extends healthcare innovation by bridging healthcare needs and software requirements. Design Thinking presents a human-centered, prototype-driven process that can be applied to any product, service, and business design [7]. The importance of undertaking this research can be gauged by recent developments in Connected Health and the need to carefully align healthcare innovation processes and healthcare needs to improve health quality and safety.…”
Section: E-pharmacymentioning
confidence: 99%