2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging industrial-technological innovation to achieve sustainable development: A systems thinking perspective

Abstract: Industrial-technological innovation (ITI) has become an important requirement for the sustainable development of China. ITI development requires a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic complexity associated with ITI systems. Previous research into ITI systems is based primarily on static methods that isolate system components, and ignore feedback on adjustments made. Based on systems thinking, this paper develop six archetypes (“Limit to Growth,” “Success to the Successful,” “Tragedy of the Commons,” “Fix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainable development has been examined in Guo et al (2021), Jost et al (2021), Lindsay et al (2021), Miklosik and Evans (2021), Mondejar et al (2021), Timpabi et al (2021), and Wang and Huang (2021). The contribution of Industry 4.0 to sustainable development has been noted by Harikannan et al (2021), Mhlanga (2021), Khan et al (2021), and Gupta et al (2021).…”
Section: Advantages Of Industry 40 For Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable development has been examined in Guo et al (2021), Jost et al (2021), Lindsay et al (2021), Miklosik and Evans (2021), Mondejar et al (2021), Timpabi et al (2021), and Wang and Huang (2021). The contribution of Industry 4.0 to sustainable development has been noted by Harikannan et al (2021), Mhlanga (2021), Khan et al (2021), and Gupta et al (2021).…”
Section: Advantages Of Industry 40 For Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failures are a result of risks and uncertainties (Ferreira et al, 2019) hence the need for more effective method of judgment to assess factors causing them in a systematic way (Guo et al, 2021). In doing so, relying solely on experts or in the case of government venture capitals (GVCs) where the management (and their chosen experts) of these institutions to make all the decisions regarding which technology-based companies qualify for funding seem to run counter with Palchinsky principles because even the best available expert on a given subject does not substitute variation, selection and feedback.…”
Section: Limits Of Expert Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, researchers have provided rich theoretical foundations, systematic thinking methods and guiding principles (Venkatesh et. Al., 2013;Guo et al, 2020), whether it is from the "New Business" talent training model, the research on inter-professional comprehensive training, or the teaching model. However, there is also the limitations of a single research discipline perspective.…”
Section: Research Status Of Boppps Teaching Modementioning
confidence: 99%