2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31153-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Online Racing and Population Cloning in Evolutionary Multirobot Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the online evolutionary process is able to consistently synthesize a set of solutions to the homing task, there are different options to potentially increase the performance of evolution in terms of the percentage of successful controllers. In recent simulation-based contributions, we have developed two complementary approaches, namely: (i) a racing technique to cut short the evaluation of poor controllers based on the task performance of past controllers [ 29 ] and (ii) a novel paradigm called online hyper-evolution [ 30 , 31 ], which can both combine the benefits of different algorithms for controller generation over time, and construct algorithms by selecting which algorithmic components should be employed for controller generation (e.g. mutation, crossover, among others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the online evolutionary process is able to consistently synthesize a set of solutions to the homing task, there are different options to potentially increase the performance of evolution in terms of the percentage of successful controllers. In recent simulation-based contributions, we have developed two complementary approaches, namely: (i) a racing technique to cut short the evaluation of poor controllers based on the task performance of past controllers [ 29 ] and (ii) a novel paradigm called online hyper-evolution [ 30 , 31 ], which can both combine the benefits of different algorithms for controller generation over time, and construct algorithms by selecting which algorithmic components should be employed for controller generation (e.g. mutation, crossover, among others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the robots used a range and bearing system to detect the presence of neighbouring robots. Although Silva et al (Silva et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2016) also evolve artificial neural network controllers in order to carry out phototaxis, they do so through online learning. These experiments use a distributed and decentralised neuroevolution algorithm that continuously modifies robots' behaviours in order to respond to changes and unforeseen circumstances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was successful in finding solutions in one hundred or less generations, but it failed to scale successfully if hundreds of generations were required. Silva et al [14] carried out a similar ap-proach, whereby they cut short the evaluation of poor controllers which proved effective in experiments with a high selective pressure, but arguably decreased diversity amongst the population.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%