2020 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/pacificvis48177.2020.1261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Peer Feedback to Improve Visualization Education

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than analyzing how a visualization corresponds to an instructor's grade, we focused on peer review feedback that students gave to one another. In a prior paper, we found that students perceived the most benefit from reviewing others and providing feedback, rather than selfreflecting or receiving feedback from others [1].…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Rather than analyzing how a visualization corresponds to an instructor's grade, we focused on peer review feedback that students gave to one another. In a prior paper, we found that students perceived the most benefit from reviewing others and providing feedback, rather than selfreflecting or receiving feedback from others [1].…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In a review of several major visualization venues, InfoVis, SciVis, VAST, EuroVis, and Pacific Vis, we found no empirical evaluation of students' work or engagement in the classroom, aside from our own [1], [6]. The use of peer review in the visualization classroom thus remains an open area of research, despite the fact that critiquing has long been acknowledged as a critical part of the visualization design process [10].…”
Section: Peer Review In Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations