2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cola.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging product line engineering for the development of domain-specific metamodeling languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paper [9] considers an original approach to creating sets of semantically related DSML languages for a particular domain, which are considered as a special type of software product lines (SPL) and for the development of which well-known domain engineering methods and technologies can be applied. In particular, the authors propose an appropriate metamodel for describing the entire DSML family of languages, which also provides support for the properties of variability in design decisions in the process of developing the target software system, and also offers an appropriate CASE tool for automating the proposed approach.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Some Related Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [9] considers an original approach to creating sets of semantically related DSML languages for a particular domain, which are considered as a special type of software product lines (SPL) and for the development of which well-known domain engineering methods and technologies can be applied. In particular, the authors propose an appropriate metamodel for describing the entire DSML family of languages, which also provides support for the properties of variability in design decisions in the process of developing the target software system, and also offers an appropriate CASE tool for automating the proposed approach.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Some Related Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in condition (4) the point of reference is at the beginning of the sentential form being parsed while in (12) it is at the end of its prefix that has been read so far during parsing, i.e., at the end of 𝜔 1 𝛼 1 𝜂 rather at the beginning of it. Second, precedence (≻) is irreflexive and thus (4). Whenever an item takes a precedence over the other, it makes the other one irrelevant as that other item will never be used to detect the longest leftmost string in a sentential form.…”
Section: Reusing the Information About The Symbols Scanned So Farmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different in regard to their use, the domain-specific languages are defined, modeled E-mail address: bostjan.slivnik@fri.uni-lj.si. and implemented using CFGs as well [3][4][5]. These reasons make a CFG one of the most widely used formalisms, even if hidden somewhere deep in a compiler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%