Abstract. The term social capital is characterized by a proliferation of meanings which give rise to different debates. The aim of this paper is to analyze the role of social capital in developing democracies. To this end, Argentina and Nicaragua, as two Latin American nations, ideally illustrate two novel theoretical positions which can serve as representative models for developing democracies. In these two countries, the process of democratization
INTRODUCTIONIn scientific research, social capital has always been a multidimensional phenomenon. Indeed, there is an apparent wealth of quantitative and qualitative research on social capital in academic publications across the disciplines of sociology, economics and political science. "Social capital has a huge appetite. It explains everything, from the individual to the society itself, disease, poverty, crime, corruption, education, democracy and governance, and so on" (Fine, 2002: 1, according to: Andriani, 2013.The term social capital is characterized by a proliferation of meanings which give rise to different debates. Promoting social capital and its importance for the development of democracy is known as the process of "democratic socialization." Here, the concept of social capital is analyzed in the context of political theory and its role in developing democracies. Democracy is believed to be a great achievement which comes from good understanding of social engineering. Thus, social capital has the key role and importance in maintaining and encouraging democracy through active citizenship, organized in various associations that connect the individual with the state. If social capital contributes to the development and survival of democracy, it further means that it has a special significance in the newly established democracies (Booth, Richard, 2009).
SOCIAL CAPITAL: GRINDING THE CONCEPTThe idea of social capital can be located in the historical series of ideas on different forms of capital. Today, the concept of social capital can be said to represent one of the most important sociological concepts which is present (in one way or another) in various social sciences and often exploited in public discourse, primarily due to the vast social repercussions which it may generate.Social capital is not a new concept in social sciences, but it gained momentum and regained popularity as a highly topical issue in the 1990s. The theorists who laid down the basis for further study of the concept of social capital are French anthropologist Pierre Bourdieu, American sociologist James Coleman and the Italian political scientist Robert Putnam, whose work inspired extensive debates and new definitions. Given the fact that it is a relatively recent concept, there is no single, universal, and widely accepted definition of social capital. Most definitions specify the characteristics of social structures, which allow increasing the efficiency of collective action. Despite the great interest and a large number of papers on the topic of social capital, there is no consensus on the...