2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study

Abstract: Background Systems science methodologies offer a promising assessment approach for clinical trials by: 1) providing an in-silico laboratory to conduct investigations where purely empirical research may be infeasible or unethical; and, 2) offering a more precise measurement of intervention benefits across individual, network, and population levels. We propose to assess the potential of systems sciences methodologies by quantifying the spillover effects of randomized contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] This pilot study had a target sample size of 100 patients, given our sampling frame (i.e., PNMUA patients who were AA and diagnosed with BC (n = 173), response rates from past research with Chicago-based AA BC survivors (56%), and a priori power analyses regarding the effect of navigation on patient-driven dissemination of breast health information at large. 36,37 Invitation letters and flyers were given to participants who met the eligibility criteria. Institutional Review Boards at each participating institution approved the study, which took place between March 2019 and June 2020.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] This pilot study had a target sample size of 100 patients, given our sampling frame (i.e., PNMUA patients who were AA and diagnosed with BC (n = 173), response rates from past research with Chicago-based AA BC survivors (56%), and a priori power analyses regarding the effect of navigation on patient-driven dissemination of breast health information at large. 36,37 Invitation letters and flyers were given to participants who met the eligibility criteria. Institutional Review Boards at each participating institution approved the study, which took place between March 2019 and June 2020.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligibility criteria included: (1) breast cancer patient at least 18 years of age or older, (2) selfidentified as African American female and a breast cancer patient at 1 of the 3 hospitals involved in this study, (3) and participated in the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas Study, a randomized controlled trial of patient navigation. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] This pilot study had a target sample size of 100 patients, given our sampling frame (i.e., PNMUA patients who were AA and diagnosed with BC (n = 173), response rates from past research with Chicago-based AA BC survivors (56%), and a priori power analyses regarding the effect of navigation on patient-driven dissemination of breast health information at large. 36,37 Invitation letters and flyers were given to participants who met the eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation