2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13489-0_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Terminological Structure for Object Reconciliation

Abstract: Abstract. It has been argued that linked open data is the major benefit of semantic technologies for the web as it provides a huge amount of structured data that can be accessed in a more effective way than web pages. While linked open data avoids many problems connected with the use of expressive ontologies such as the knowledge acquisition bottleneck, data heterogeneity remains a challenging problem. In particular, identical objects may be referred to by different URIs in different data sets. Identifying suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EPWNG [18] 100 100 100 RiMOM [23] 100 100 100 ObjectCoref [7] 100 99.8 99.9 LN2R [15] 100 100 100 CODI [12] 87 …”
Section: Evaluation and Preliminary Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EPWNG [18] 100 100 100 RiMOM [23] 100 100 100 ObjectCoref [7] 100 99.8 99.9 LN2R [15] 100 100 100 CODI [12] 87 …”
Section: Evaluation and Preliminary Resultsunclassified
“…Hu et al [7] build a kernel by adopting the formal semantics of the Semantic Web that is then extended iteratively in terms of discriminative property-value pairs in the descriptions of URIs. Algorithms that combine formal semantics of the Semantic Web and string matching techniques also include Zhishi.me [11], LN2R [15], CODI [12] and ASMOV [8]. These systems can be applied to datasets in different domains without human provided matching rules, such as People, Location, Organization and Restaurant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a feature evaluation verifies the effectiveness of each proposed pruning technique compared to alternatives. For future work, we will apply P-EPWNG to datasets from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 4 and also evaluate if our pruning techniques can help to scale other entity coreference algorithms [8], [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms that combine formal semantics of the Semantic Web and string matching techniques also include Zhishi.me [13], LN2R [14], CODI [15] and ASMOV [16].…”
Section: B Evaluation Function Based Context Pruningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researching links involve many steps: link-based object classification (categorizes objects primarily based on links and attributes) [7], object kind prediction (predicts object types supported attributes, links, and objects joined to it) [8], link kind prediction (predicts the aim of the link supported the objects involved) [9], link existence prediction (predicts the existence of a link) [10], link cardinality estimation (predicting the amount of links (and objects reached) to an object) [11], object reconciliation (determining whether or not 2 objects are the same supported their links) [12], cluster detection (predicting if an object set belongs together) [13], subgraph detection (discovering sub-graphs inside networks) [14], and data mining (mining for information concerning data) [15], [16]. Other samples of mining social networks are link prediction, namely exploitation the options intrinsic of the present model of a social network to model future connections inside the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%