2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-013-0125-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging the analysis of parametric uncertainty for building energy model calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real data of hourly and monthly power, energy and temperature were used to calibrate the lighting, equipment and HVAC system modelled in the Energy Plus tool. O'Neill and Eisenhower [8] defined a methodology to assess the most important parameters affecting the simulation in order to identify parameter combinations that produce the best fit to measured data. Raftery et al [9] used a case study with high-level of detail to demonstrate a methodology for calibrating whole building energy models by using measured lighting and plug load data in the simulation at hourly intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real data of hourly and monthly power, energy and temperature were used to calibrate the lighting, equipment and HVAC system modelled in the Energy Plus tool. O'Neill and Eisenhower [8] defined a methodology to assess the most important parameters affecting the simulation in order to identify parameter combinations that produce the best fit to measured data. Raftery et al [9] used a case study with high-level of detail to demonstrate a methodology for calibrating whole building energy models by using measured lighting and plug load data in the simulation at hourly intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disagreement between simulated and metered energy consumption represents a common issue in building simulation [16]. When dealing with existing buildings, models are usually calibrated in order to obtain low values of the Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Squared Error (CV (RMSE)) and of Normalized Mean Bias Error (NMBE) for the whole building's monthly use [17,18]. Those standard metrics are usually applied to compare the outputs from the calibrated model with observed values of energy consumption:…”
Section: Uncertainty Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies based on calibration have been carried out [6,[12][13][14][15][16][17] but as yet no universal consensus guidelines have been presented. There are thus standard criteria for validating a calibrated model but the lack of a formal and recognized methodology still makes CS a process highly dependent on the user's skills and judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%