2000
DOI: 10.2307/2657541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging the State: Private Money and the Development of Public Education for Blacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. (2002) demonstrate that philanthropic dollars do not appear to have been very fungible in this sense, and thus black children benefited substantially from the efforts of the philanthropists (see also Strong, Walters, Driscoll, and Rosenberg 2000). In terms of our model, improvements in black school quality financed by philanthropic efforts increased the economic benefits of black school attendance.…”
Section: Applying the Model: An Analytic Narrativementioning
confidence: 78%
“…al. (2002) demonstrate that philanthropic dollars do not appear to have been very fungible in this sense, and thus black children benefited substantially from the efforts of the philanthropists (see also Strong, Walters, Driscoll, and Rosenberg 2000). In terms of our model, improvements in black school quality financed by philanthropic efforts increased the economic benefits of black school attendance.…”
Section: Applying the Model: An Analytic Narrativementioning
confidence: 78%
“…A third is to demonstrate the utility of explicitly political and historical approaches to the sociology of education. We are not the first to do this: Others have used political and historical approaches to connect education with US state formation (Steffes 2012), racial formation (Malczewski 2016, Strong et al 2000), state-level political institutions ( Johnston 2014), and tax politics (Schrag 1998;Martin 2008), for example. Yet sociologists of higher education have not fully exploited the intellectual tools of political and historical sociology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this respect, the imagery of nonprofits as entities located in some distinctive "third sector" (for a critique, see Hall in this volume) is particularly disabling for understanding innovation as a product of the transposition of association or professional models to political mobilization (Clemens 1993;Moore 1996) or "leveraging the state" with the resources and practices of philanthropic foundations (Strong et al 2000). Here again, appreciation of the polyvalent quality of many nonprofit organizations and associations is central to understanding their political salience.…”
Section: Ideas Innovations and Exemplarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts were initially viewed with suspicion; indeed, many states 4 The study of social movement philanthropy (Jenkins 1998;Ostrander 1995) represents an important exception to this generalization. For example, in the post-Reconstruction South, money from the Rosenwald Fund aided disenfranchised blacks in "leveraging the state" to expand public education for black children (Strong et al 2000). 5 The complex taxonomies of organizational form also plague efforts to integrate research on social movements with the study of formal political institutions-the discontinuity between the two is often overstated by the use of distinctive analytic vocabularies (Burstein 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%