2022
DOI: 10.1075/sll.00070.vil
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical access in bimodal bilinguals

Abstract: Manuel Carreiras, for raising the level of research related to Spanish Sign Language to the scientific equivalent of the "champions league", to paraphrase what he once told me, and for allowing me to be part of his team; and Dr. Brendan Costello for his invaluable support. Words alone cannot express all that this work owes him as a supervisor and how much I value him as a friend.The rest of the sign language team members at BCBL have also left their imprint on this thesis. Thanks to Noemi Fariña and Miguel Áng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, it lets us examine the coactivation of a word (or sign) when nothing at all is heard (or seen) and to disentangle the impact of the overt linguistic signal on lexical access of words and signs. In a previous study ( 24 , 25 ), we examined the role of sublexical units in word recognition and in sign recognition using the visual world paradigm. In this paradigm, participants are presented with a target lexical item while viewing a screen with four images, some of which are similar in form to the target item (i.e., they are phonological competitors); an eye-tracker measures fixations to the different images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More generally, it lets us examine the coactivation of a word (or sign) when nothing at all is heard (or seen) and to disentangle the impact of the overt linguistic signal on lexical access of words and signs. In a previous study ( 24 , 25 ), we examined the role of sublexical units in word recognition and in sign recognition using the visual world paradigm. In this paradigm, participants are presented with a target lexical item while viewing a screen with four images, some of which are similar in form to the target item (i.e., they are phonological competitors); an eye-tracker measures fixations to the different images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parts of this work were developed from the doctoral thesis of S.V. ( 25 ). We thank the organizations that provided staff and premises to run the experiments: CILSEM (Sign Language Interpreters Association in Madrid), ASORMADRID (Deaf Association in Madrid), Fundación CNSE (Foundation of the National Deaf People's Confederation in Madrid), APERSORVA (Deaf Association in Valladolid), ARANSBUR (Association of Families with Deaf Children, Burgos), APSBU (Deaf Association in Burgos), and ASORNA (Deaf Association in Navarra).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%