2020
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical Coverages, Inferencing Unknown Words and Reading Comprehension: How Are They Related?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 90% of texts for reading is covered by around 3,000 word families 1 . To read independently, a person has to know 7,000-8,000 word families receptively (Laufer 2020). According to Nation (2006), 95% comprehension in novels is realistic with the knowledge of 4,000 word families, whereas in audition, with 3,000 word families.…”
Section: Teaching English: From a Foreign To An International Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 90% of texts for reading is covered by around 3,000 word families 1 . To read independently, a person has to know 7,000-8,000 word families receptively (Laufer 2020). According to Nation (2006), 95% comprehension in novels is realistic with the knowledge of 4,000 word families, whereas in audition, with 3,000 word families.…”
Section: Teaching English: From a Foreign To An International Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…">They were used in previous pedagogical coverage studies ( Lady Chatterley's Lover , Mid‐Frequency readers). Their lexis comprises an atypically high proportion of items from the first two 1,000‐levels of the BNC/COCA (90% or more, as termed comprehensible input for nonadvanced learners by Laufer, 2020b; COCA Speech, Mid‐Frequency readers, House, M.D ., Presidents, Lady Chatterley's Lover ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not claim that the coverage provided by the NFL7 is sufficient for comprehension of authentic, advanced texts. A coverage of 98% is considered optimal and 95% minimal for that purpose (Hu & Nation, 2000; Laufer & Ravenhorst‐Kalovski, 2010; Schmitt, Jiang, & Grabe, 2011), although this has arguably been revised down recently to 90% in certain cases (Laufer, 2020b). However, none of the other lists at the 3,000 level offer the necessary coverage either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible explanation for the negligible vocabulary learning from reading non-glossed texts in these experiments is that some of the texts used were not quite comprehensible WITHOUT the glosses. When a text is not understood by learners, they will not be able to make use of context to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words (Laufer, 2020). Whether a text will be sufficiently well understood depends on numerous factors (Bernhardt, 2010;Koda, 2005), and one such factor is what proportion of the words in the text the learner already knows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%