2016
DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v63i2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical development of noun and predicate comprehension and production in isiZulu

Abstract: This study seeks to investigate the development of noun and predicate comprehension and production in isiZulu-speaking children between the ages of 25 and 36 months. It compares lexical comprehension and production in isiZulu, using an Italian developed and validated vocabulary assessment tool: The Picture Naming Game (PiNG) developed by Bello, Giannantoni, Pettenati, Stefanini and Caselli (2012). The PiNG tool includes four subtests, one each for subnoun comprehension (NC), noun production (NP), predicate com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for these findings may lie in the level of exposure children have to animals and representations of animals in different geographic environments below 30 months of age. In a study of 2- to 3-year-old isiZulu-speaking urban children, names of domestic animals such as chicken were produced by 78% of children, but names of wild animals like lion and crocodile were only produced by 8% and 3% of children, respectively ( Kunene and Ahmed, 2016 ). Children who have early exposure to representations of animals in the form of toys or on television and in books (which is more likely in urban areas with more resources) will produce more animal names than children who have little exposure to animals (in under-resourced urban areas and rural areas) unless there is a greater variety of actual animals in rural areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for these findings may lie in the level of exposure children have to animals and representations of animals in different geographic environments below 30 months of age. In a study of 2- to 3-year-old isiZulu-speaking urban children, names of domestic animals such as chicken were produced by 78% of children, but names of wild animals like lion and crocodile were only produced by 8% and 3% of children, respectively ( Kunene and Ahmed, 2016 ). Children who have early exposure to representations of animals in the form of toys or on television and in books (which is more likely in urban areas with more resources) will produce more animal names than children who have little exposure to animals (in under-resourced urban areas and rural areas) unless there is a greater variety of actual animals in rural areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered that isiZulu-speaking children's inventory has been linked to linguistic input at home (Kunene-Nicolas & Ahmed, 2016). Therefore, the influence of a child's background and developmental history on both the quality and quantity of language development are critical to language development (McLaughlin, Sheridan, & Nelson, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%