Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language - HLT '91 1992
DOI: 10.3115/1075527.1075580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical disambiguation using simulated annealing

Abstract: The resolution of lexical ambiguity is important for most natural language processing tasks, and a range of computational techniques have been proposed for its solution. None of these has yet proven effective on a large scale. In this paper, we describe a method for lexical disambiguation of text using the definitions in a machine-readable dictionary together with the technique of simulated annealing. The method operates on complete sentences and attempts to select the optimal combinations of word senses for a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Early work varied between counting word overlaps between definitions of the word Cowie, Guthrie, & Guthrie, 1992;Kilgarriff & Rosenzweig, 2000;Lesk, 1986) to finding distances between concepts following the structure of the LKB (Patwardhan, Banerjee, & Pedersen, 2003). As an alternative, graph-based methods have gained much attention in recent years (Agirre & Soroa, 2009;Mihalcea, 2005;Navigli & Lapata, 2010;Navigli & Velardi, 2005;Ponzetto & Navigli, 2010;Sinha & Mihalcea, 2007).…”
Section: Word Sense Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early work varied between counting word overlaps between definitions of the word Cowie, Guthrie, & Guthrie, 1992;Kilgarriff & Rosenzweig, 2000;Lesk, 1986) to finding distances between concepts following the structure of the LKB (Patwardhan, Banerjee, & Pedersen, 2003). As an alternative, graph-based methods have gained much attention in recent years (Agirre & Soroa, 2009;Mihalcea, 2005;Navigli & Lapata, 2010;Navigli & Velardi, 2005;Ponzetto & Navigli, 2010;Sinha & Mihalcea, 2007).…”
Section: Word Sense Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In all the evaluations, the disambiguation has been performed over all the terms contained in the snippets. This choice was due to the fact that the disambiguation of one word can affect others in its context [59]. Disambiguating the keywords only is unfeasible, as the keywords need the context where they are located in order to be correctly disambiguated.…”
Section: A2 Probabilistic Word Sense Disambiguation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge-based approaches make use of Machine Readable Dictionaries (MRDs) (e.g. Cowie et al 1992;Lesk 1986), thesauri (e.g. Yarowsky 1992), computational lexicons (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%