2016
DOI: 10.1515/lingty-2016-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages

Abstract: While word classes are language-specific categories, lexical flexibility remains under discussion. This article investigates this phenomenon in a balanced sample of 36 Oceanic languages, a genetic group that has figured prominently in this debate. Based on a systematic survey of the morphosyntactic behavior of a range of semantic word types in three propositional functions, it is shown how lexical flexibility can be measured and compared across languages and constructions. While Oceanic flexibility is pervasiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a well-known observation that parts of speech differ cross-linguistically (Croft, 2005); e.g. in various language families, adjectives tend to behave like a sub-class of verbs (Dixon, 2004;Van Lier, 2016). As a corollary, many dictionary authors choose to gloss property words as if they were verbs, with such definitions as 'be small' (static reading), 'become small' (dynamic reading), or even 'to be or become small'.…”
Section: Acd (Austronesian) and Stedt (Sino-tibetan)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-known observation that parts of speech differ cross-linguistically (Croft, 2005); e.g. in various language families, adjectives tend to behave like a sub-class of verbs (Dixon, 2004;Van Lier, 2016). As a corollary, many dictionary authors choose to gloss property words as if they were verbs, with such definitions as 'be small' (static reading), 'become small' (dynamic reading), or even 'to be or become small'.…”
Section: Acd (Austronesian) and Stedt (Sino-tibetan)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be considered odd to include descriptors and actions in the same category, but in Hobongan, there is not a clear syntactic distinction between verbal elements and modifier elements; terms shift between and among syntactic functions, as has been noted for Austronesian languages(Van Lier 2016). Because this is primarily a semantic description, the apparent syntactic distinctions are backgrounded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%