“…For example, the English form includes the complexity of the child's multi-word utterances (Fenson et al, 2007), and the Finnish form includes the child's usage of inflections (Lyytinen, 1999). The CDI-LF has been adapted for numerous languages (for a comparison study, see Bleses et al, 2008) and used widely (e.g., Fenson et al, 1993;Marchman and Martine-Sussmann, 2002;Stolt et al, 2009;Torppa et al, 2010;Eriksson et al, 2012;Simonsen et al, 2014;Marjanovič-Umek et al, 2017;Viana et al, 2017;Pérez-Pereira and Cruz, 2018;Cadime et al, 2019;Patrucco-Nanchen et al, 2019). As a result, there is plenty of evidence of the validity and usability of different languages in longitudinal studies (Fenson et al, 2007;Hurtado et al, 2014;Jago et al, 2023).…”