2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical-Morphological Modeling for Legal Text Analysis

Abstract: Abstract. In the context of the Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment (COLIEE), we propose a method comprising the necessary steps for finding relevant documents to a legal question and deciding on textual entailment evidence to provide a correct answer. The proposed method is based on the combination of several lexical and morphological characteristics, to build a language model and a set of features for Machine Learning algorithms. We provide a detailed study on the proposed method performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ha et al show that similarity scoring can be used for entailment detection [9], however, this may only work for low-level inferences. Instead, Carvalho et al suggest to use classifiers with a rich feature set [4]. We incorporate an exact matching component for obvious cases of positive entailment in our solution and train a classifier for the majority of cases.…”
Section: Thresholdingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ha et al show that similarity scoring can be used for entailment detection [9], however, this may only work for low-level inferences. Instead, Carvalho et al suggest to use classifiers with a rich feature set [4]. We incorporate an exact matching component for obvious cases of positive entailment in our solution and train a classifier for the majority of cases.…”
Section: Thresholdingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of charge prediction is also related to the legal assistant systems. In this field, answering legal questions and searching relevant cases have been extensively studied [13], [42], [43]. Some attempts consider charge prediction as a part of the automatic judgment prediction [44]- [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work showed the best LIR performance in 2016. Our previous main work in COLIEE [4] introduced a ranking method called R 2 N C (Ranking Related N-gram Collections), based on a mixed size n-gram language model, which used links between the documents (articles) in the legal corpus to build n-gram collections for each of them, and a variant of TF-IDF scoring to rank them. It achieved a LIR 2nd place in 2015.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance analysis stage was done entirely with R 2 N C [4], which can be summarized in the following process: 9. Store the model.…”
Section: Relevance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%