Lexical plurals through meronymy and hyperonymy

Lammert, Marie

doi:10.1075/li.39.2.07lam

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the canonical use of number is compositional, as in this criterion, the various types of lexical plurals are all non-canonical; see Acquaviva (2008Acquaviva ( , 2016a, Gardelle (2016), Lammert (2016) and Lauwers and Lammert (2016), among others. This criterion gives no reason to expect that the values should be anything other than "equal", and hence equally distributed.…”

Section: Semantic Compositionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties

Corbett

2018

Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many languages have an interesting class of nouns, the pluralia tantum, which have restricted number possibilities when, in some sense, they should not. Thus English binoculars has no singular, which is worth noting (that is, it is not predictable). True, there are other nouns denoting items consisting of two significant parts which behave similarly (spectacles, trousers.. .); indeed they are subject to 'middle-size generalizations' (Koenig 1999). But there are two reasons to note such nouns. First there are many English nouns equally denoting items consisting of two significant parts which are unremarkable in this respect: bicycle, bigraph, Bactrian camel, couple, duo.. . And second, there are languages with number systems roughly comparable to that of English in which the equivalents of binoculars and trousers are normal count nouns: Russian binokl', French pantalon. While pluralia tantum are of continuing interest, it is typically only the English type which is considered. But these familiar examples offer an entry point to a collection of lexical items, some with much stranger behaviour, lurking between the semi-predictable and the unexpectedly defective. In particular, some instances demonstrate that we cannot maintain the general assumption that the 'internal' morphosemantic specification of a paradigm cell and its 'external' morphosyntactic requirement are necessarily identical. I therefore set out a full typology of these fascinating nouns, so that their significance can be more fully appreciated. I start from the notion of canonical noun, and calibrate the different non-canonical properties according to a set of orthogonal criteria.

show abstract

Section: Semantic Compositionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties

Corbett

2018

Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Lexical plurals through meronymy and hyperonymy

Cited by 1 publication

References 16 publications

Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties

Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About