2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
190
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
37
190
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, results in the control comparisons are consistent with previous reports that unexpected but congruent words elicited a larger N400 and a frontal positivity relative to strongly expected words (e.g., Delong, Urbach, Groppe, & Kutas, 2011;Federmeier et al, 2007;Thornhill & Van Petten, 2012). Previous research has proposed that the frontal positivity reflects the suppression or inhibition of a prediction for a different word or concept (Federmeier et al, 2007;Kutas, 1993) and/or learning signal from which to update future predictions (Federmeier, Kutas, & Schul, 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, results in the control comparisons are consistent with previous reports that unexpected but congruent words elicited a larger N400 and a frontal positivity relative to strongly expected words (e.g., Delong, Urbach, Groppe, & Kutas, 2011;Federmeier et al, 2007;Thornhill & Van Petten, 2012). Previous research has proposed that the frontal positivity reflects the suppression or inhibition of a prediction for a different word or concept (Federmeier et al, 2007;Kutas, 1993) and/or learning signal from which to update future predictions (Federmeier, Kutas, & Schul, 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This frontally distributed late positivity has been observed in previous studies and has been argued to reflect processes that are triggered when strong predictions are disconfirmed (DeLong, Quante, & Kutas, 2014;Federmeier, Wlotko, De Ochoa-Dewald, & Kutas, 2007;Thornhill & van Petten, 2012;van Petten & Luka, 2012). We will return to discuss the relationship between this late frontal positivity and the P600 in the General Discussion.…”
Section: Event-related Potentials (Control Comparison)supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed an attenuated N400 amplitude for expected compared to semantically related words, and also an attenuated N400 amplitude for semantically related words compared to semantically unrelated words during the 250-450 ms time window. That shows, as 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 previously reported during English sentence comprehension (Federmeier and Kutas, 1999;Federmeier et al, 2002;Thornhill and Van Petten, 2012), that listeners are not only able to predict upcoming words, but also their semantic features, which also allows them to pre-activate semantically related words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Also, and crucially, within-category words elicited smaller N400 amplitudes than between-category words. Federmeier and Kutas (1999) interpreted this gradation as suggesting that the ease with which a word (even if it is not expected) is accessed depends on its semantic similarity to the word expected in a given context (see also Federmeier et al (2002), for an extension in the auditory modality; Thornhill and Van Petten (2012)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%